IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-rseme-00.txt

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 30 October 2019 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048DB1209BC for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mfTsXQX3xoxm for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1529120810 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F55F40737; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1A9F40737 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IcDbQAGo_Fk8 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9729F4072C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB976601EB; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 20:49:43 +0200 (EET)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AuEO127GZ8IK; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 20:49:42 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A165660122; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 20:49:42 +0200 (EET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <DD26A382-4570-4B38-9DBC-07D1F7F4A045@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 20:49:41 +0200
Message-Id: <AF955C24-4056-4775-B9B2-D6773925C973@piuha.net>
References: <157195362260.11387.2707786903653263155.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E9E92899-87E7-4036-8182-3330622DE71C@rfc-editor.org> <DD26A382-4570-4B38-9DBC-07D1F7F4A045@piuha.net>
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-rseme-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RSOC <rsoc@iab.org>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Due to some off-list comments (thanks!), I realise that I wanted to clarify the comment that I made about past chairs in the text. I specifically would like to suggest a change in the text of the document. But I did not want to state an opinion about who is or is not suitable or capable for the task. 

The change that I’d suggest is:

OLD:
Past IAB or IETF chairs would likely be good choices.
NEW:
(deleted)

Rationale: What people you want leading an effort is always a consideration, a complex one, with many variables. I just don’t want us to put any particular set of people in a special role, either in positive or negative fashion.

Jari

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email