Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 30 October 2020 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94683A0AC3; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b=jJZ3sjPV; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QUM7JHck
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-TWC5HNrUXJ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511283A0A85; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D7AF40723; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF277F40727 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=jJZ3sjPV; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QUM7JHck
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sD8-7ItbtMOD for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8400F4071D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F795C00E1; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:57:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:57:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=P KbV5tTYBiDKRpCXhSDP+0T5b2QYhMNSmvHN5IXLjyg=; b=jJZ3sjPVOfCYF6hvw 5gioUYm2h7tvm9nnG/i/nVsoFItP2/p7pLbbFuVbpMPRhA65KcOUd0JstAxFPp7O pJTZpb91XIpYc7IR//uZQfeapIcqDIJqsgk8EC/5ocslxNO23iorEHipsL0zRd16 tc88wPaLkqGUIl8+kCR4kSSkwo2f76f1cHvTRQqnAYCxh/MClzQoozngOjaiMaEq dDYg+JkJQgdn/G2JhTgYclfB9gbtNVj6vLs94dw3Tc8gKuzuvbACbcJW8/HzsYIW EqvXpr4+UjAoWintgTTyF2kanFpABOnzlQi3hpfWs1IY9ZjnBeCY2crbp9Ypzstm WVWzA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=PKbV5tTYBiDKRpCXhSDP+0T5b2QYhMNSmvHN5IXLj yg=; b=QUM7JHckQxJmSqcknZ4bUJZ1m55Va3u1x69FwCKHey959zLJx+JJIygqz Yg9HLGBzC5F2LG5rrVHgLTEZ7DcC8otWBZje0Hqce3ZCOMorMS3SLwPFH+399bys 9P42RykQX6r5KaQZvcr4SiXtsDo8fYgas0SymSZmAYzDf9URxMr7OtLKbCVMEial zSrRQjkoIUHA9MBEM5PCg2l1KXPop2woiZ/4QS7vma53KS6uX2eJPbWN2fPw3es4 zV5jmkVp+fE6NFeP+DgZxqCt0RMJi9l9ZxAuiVr5bWQT5+ardAP6WvNSEZuCVbSp cZLgL7C00JHh2QNYFEzWl3JgQTxIw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:92SbXwvwEjepjZmZY_lxzTSjuNlsyrvB7t5BnJu6E_wDrXmlbBzy6Q> <xme:92SbX9cy1JIfCL-hkMzmYmXAmu7Ulnq48G81nN9UZJNPmcjDP0n470PEvCQfswSvG Rue9HgI0KDqeUrvwQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrleeggddvkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmh dthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhkucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhn ohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekudekgfegiedvfeetgfejkeettdeghe dtveeijeettdelvdfhueegudetudegudenucffohhmrghinheprhhftgdqvgguihhtohhr rdhorhhgpdhmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudduledrudejrdduheekrddvhedunecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehm nhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:92SbX7wnm3F4DmTeImFYMiwrmsDjCNIOvRWYr5IP2TDM49gbtSdw7Q> <xmx:92SbXzM_9rIiThCXTs7Igem2_AvzSL1F7NH67gpI8FzX1GZfPE63GA> <xmx:92SbXw9_6Cjfu4SCgdHSsjVovqYtDVVjV9KWflnZIjmYfWtZ8EgfKA> <xmx:92SbXyK_2Bc0C2Q0yHjIQQ08XKsR56Cj4p8qlKxuslpcEKgZlyDZhg>
Received: from [192.168.7.30] (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D4EF93280060; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:57:25 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <7e447678-599c-3bdd-40ff-eacea9ab8f78@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:57:24 +1100
Message-Id: <E2C4653A-6557-4E80-847C-B3E77A35BA7E@mnot.net>
References: <30D23CA0-2A80-4BA3-AC18-285CF45FB5FF@mnot.net> <7e447678-599c-3bdd-40ff-eacea9ab8f78@nthpermutation.com>
To: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Sorry, nothing can convince me to become an Emacs user.

Cheers,

> On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:54 am, Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> wrote:
> 
> On 10/29/2020 8:23 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> 1. Can we identify a freely available tool for correctly line-wrapping XML that people can insert into their toolchain pre-RPC, so that the RPC doesn't need to hand-wrap lines?
> 
> Emacs SGML  or nXML mode - C-x h M-x sgml-pretty-print
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest