IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] I need your "good" RFCs

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 12 February 2021 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DE53A1810; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:38:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.671
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.671 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J6HcKlE4Itt7; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:38:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E383A1814; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:38:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C80F40764; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:38:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311EAF40764 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:38:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 628OIntHkHaZ for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:38:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C226F40763 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:38:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 73B8923DD0; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:38:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
References: <yblpn16jmt0.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <9f4b16e4-0412-ac11-f82b-f8f999c869ab@mtcc.com> <CAA=duU34kjW6KYyKZfRRejv5j41m2tEVj-qcd-buzGHnC+VYtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:38:31 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU34kjW6KYyKZfRRejv5j41m2tEVj-qcd-buzGHnC+VYtQ@mail.gmail.com> (Andrew G. Malis's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:57:42 -0500")
Message-ID: <ybl35y1jieg.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] I need your "good" RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> writes:

> If "interoperable implementations" is an indicator, then it's hard to beat RFC
> 826, which must have many many thousands, if not millions, of independent
> implementations by now.

Ha, that's a very good point!  Thank you.

I assume that must mean it's readable and understandable then too.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email