IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] what metric replaces page-count?

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 13 April 2021 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6753A0ADD; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=jaZ0Oiib; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=jkjU3QWx
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UunWd3V6ugno; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 275F83A0ADB; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F279F407C5; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15B1F407A4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=jaZ0Oiib; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=jkjU3QWx
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3xjFsACssrTU for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D43DF407C5 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9754 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2021 01:54:43 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; s=2614.6074f9e3.k2104; bh=oq2AVZ3BqUDftynbcFTdf2zZddVO6VN2XfuAFvI3JqE=; b=jaZ0Oiib3Dk3aLYP+mkX+xKunN5bPxDF00fb1n6EIklWbB1kLeS7U/LTWvI+K6skvYjG/WfPtCEQx2prE4lefQ+bFliSirPQCPeqfrYLIM2pAzAe8ZyFmh4kik5DbYXlldE5tWGzmiNhQU6WU1z+GmYy0cNQaIXGQyWb65GVj7HBaDQZGgoNuCGz0MHKrrittwANEjD2BY0o+3rzfaDYOAS2SWxeXRXJbb1RF3p6ftye+jnII9i/wXGCS5xs2h4fIvQNFgNblYSPYJLVzWA/xdkOguPLF6SW3mTy09ZqbBDX2Wx84umPXMIPfNfV/DxO9d35leRbhdFl6WfVYpmoGQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; s=2614.6074f9e3.k2104; bh=oq2AVZ3BqUDftynbcFTdf2zZddVO6VN2XfuAFvI3JqE=; b=jkjU3QWxyEvwYUJHPgvjdsyO6fWOTx4zSeDTifDFcz1y7tG5BN5/2lRDS206MbmvgwPRbctSIwzkoxgqoP8WbBvvE8sOol5kj8LHLnhsfnfj0OBwUwgvPHBVluUlwrNujfeXuiSzW/1U2vkO1n2aTE3fPagYyloBmhzNxnl8lG69Im2D/G48SjQvfQjDczoMZfXRoWMCyRPirWHkIch3tfvtb20P99byAOYgFq+H3Rxzi2dzN9DHgloD6fVCALY2mPCu/4QJh8dlmfYHWA1FuJhtdsfsGStIYmeRVPliCCl6QQUOgZWWZ4E3jLaw2Jbi5QiD9f1siEVX5ck7S+2u+g==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 13 Apr 2021 01:54:42 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4679D72C4864; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:54:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAE872C4846 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:54:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:54:40 -0400
Message-ID: <14f3d28f-c96-2530-6a41-a182bc633f9b@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] what metric replaces page-count?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

It appears that Michael Richardson  <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> said:
>John Levine's "but IDs still have page count" helps me not at all when
>comparing two RFCs.  It this a document I can read over a coffee break, or do
>I need to lock-myself in the wifi-free tree-house all afternoon?

The file size should give you a pretty good hint.

I suppose we could publish mechanically generated word counts for some definition of "word".

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email