IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Implementations of v3?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 24 October 2016 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7D91295AA for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QJVWruTIueQ4 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3841F127076 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E52B81CCE; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC28B81CCE; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z_BH7FJLsjI4; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD69B81CCD; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.106.49]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LnxQO-1caJm52X0a-00g35Y; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:35:37 +0200
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20161024175942.GA30369@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <d7a8364b-52d0-e9c8-38f0-0514bb5d847d@rfc-editor.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <925bc579-a04d-65df-7c38-f20cb120d975@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:35:39 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d7a8364b-52d0-e9c8-38f0-0514bb5d847d@rfc-editor.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:A87JyJClit6dECNNEPvBvof65zxZu9ADxvt6xCO2GBZTA9RkoOW cJ/QGtgtHE7bEcMWRsPhue19OTPkd2560Pw4Bu2Wztxci1nhuD2CA4ZIiXeOTE3Dycjathr DnDY8dC/N3XB6k1F1wzw+LOmnLvQeuBUsHc3ZfjmJaHqpVjNQ4h9VscS+rJ6Pfbw8cKd6Gz SIbUj9IE8Es3AyB8Kh7og==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:/BfBtVK5xbc=:5UXx94WeT43H/hPrnLAAU0 4cKJzOitVsyZBcj+I3TUa0RdQ0RdqBsawIVh93CxVY2qYMbTuAymXaXpMWBob/G9jDGHRgmek npuB6XpJ658h0mUqx+MMzsG7BfsfUilcyN/FTf7zVBJQMvWv7461hS4NSSPd+qRYVKUS5SD/w T795V5/LBaLaW3oWclR8XWzL2JGWge04oyAHxSZ+aA8eTWE+Gq5VIABV3/YmmzevZA1U+YwpV sqiLi/W0jJJNgAzN3W/HL93QVHM97D6bY2WoKsTHGmTM2LUxMgnKfQCsVSHz4RthcSHYLGY1D LqFZ+N9KJU4pchYjqUYx2WMu5kLbXxv9+iMQBmPszXkq5XQQfr3EFMbi32QFq9Qz5OJ/nfVjm XdhjafE56t+rZhkX56Fi9eQi7KB9qQBux5iaHWQj/xWV3fSbLer1S1R+hW3TaMfyp12piu/s9 0hcUVTUG/gVdF9XpL2LqYfHb+AnMuEfnk3dS1//ZF6vM+3MqascClAIeyAyENMaNSOYh1Ic9r Z1IS9wekGFpDLC2Qaokp6puUaQOd3XeUmBBrUJ6jAo3lpmKkIotlpnJ4tC8NsiRBSxcVyj0P1 Ns/qR7FOQfrzbmtTDqGcJEFZnrhkl5jkis/oWK/LhbGDPNDy1l3WJN+OejJtENnE72bcYYrHO aKVr4R7rwN43BzhilgXAfSpN0wQumcPqd9knL+XSm8yp84T1LinNskvpmHmQqUvZ7ZBQgdR1p GRTYpdnJcF4GqNKOtHLYvtLAasfOtv1d/bSDeuHrpyN9dxL/YfN91SrXsJs18cAPSXGm/JwSM ov3vDzy
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Implementations of v3?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 2016-10-24 20:07, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> On 10/24/16 10:59 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> Now that the RFCs on the new canonical format are in AUTH48, what is
>> the state of their implementation? I noticed the SOWs
>> <https://iaoc.ietf.org/rfps.html> but I did'nt find about the
>> results. Are the tools done, almost done, work in progress?
>
> The RFP went out for bid, with the end date of Oct 17 2016. The
> responses are still being discussed. So, no tools yet. Timing TBD.

rfc2629.xslt implements significant parts of v3 - feedback appreciated. 
See <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html#v3>.

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email