[rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts

ajs at anvilwalrusden.com (Andrew Sullivan) Fri, 12 February 2016 16:43 UTC

From: ajs at anvilwalrusden.com (Andrew Sullivan)
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:43:55 -0500
Subject: [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
In-Reply-To: <56BE0834.9030406@gmx.de>
References: <20160211173901.28789.59265.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56BDFD7B.4020803@rfc-editor.org> <56BE0834.9030406@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20160212164355.GA66257@mx2.yitter.info>

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:28:36PM +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Sending feedback to the IAB list apparently means that it will only be
> visible to IAB members. That seems like a very bad idea for public review.

There's no restriction that you _only_ send the note to the iab list,
but this is how the IAB has ever done the community review part of IAB
stream documents.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com

[rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
[rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Julian Reschke
[rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Andrew Sullivan
[rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
[rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Julian Reschke
[rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Andrew Sullivan