Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3

Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org> Mon, 21 December 2020 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB9E3A06E7; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:47:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7yWqoVKW-GZG; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 568CF3A091B; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19694F4071F; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:47:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0705EF4071F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:47:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id librrcDYBMex for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [92.243.22.217]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6F5EF40719 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:648:8400:8e7d:3995:454c:9923:c3b5] (unknown [IPv6:2601:648:8400:8e7d:3995:454c:9923:c3b5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3450FAE11A; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 01:47:06 +0100 (CET)
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20201219215415.CFEBA2AE17AC@ary.qy> <53f68fa2-933f-8909-0c37-6e8e1d5e9c9b@petit-huguenin.org> <93bd1bc0-229-3914-ba71-ccaf1976f69@taugh.com> <7b588e1d-74db-4bab-6154-4e8306fd779b@petit-huguenin.org> <482B5895-0A89-43B4-9CF0-D8E6B0A5EB5B@tzi.org> <9dc7f667-dc1f-4b35-3632-874c50d915de@petit-huguenin.org> <e29e555a-82-3616-14-186686d04ec3@taugh.com>
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
Message-ID: <c27c26c7-cbfe-3766-ddda-2367f22a6092@petit-huguenin.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:47:04 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e29e555a-82-3616-14-186686d04ec3@taugh.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 12/20/20 10:38 AM, John R Levine wrote:
>> I am arguing that normative text can be understood as paraphrasing a formal specification (which stays invisible and in most cases nonexistent) and that concision, including using ASCII, is key for that paraphrasing.  See section IV of [1].
> 
> Like I said, the specs you implement are quite different from the ones I implement.  Take a look at RFC 7489 which we are currently revising.
> 

I'll prepare an example, hopefully based on 7489 (that's not my area of expertise), but with the Holidays coming that'll take a couple weeks.

In any case that is not a discussion suitable for that mailing-list, so I'll follow-up on fdt@ietf.org instead.

-- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest