Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Fri, 27 March 2020 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23623A0875 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=cooperw.in header.b=maBQ7Vp8; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=yfwKprJQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e8qdI0ZNrqpo for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C4A73A08A8 for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817BAF40712; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142C3F40712 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=maBQ7Vp8; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=yfwKprJQ
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id noWBvJm3W0-o for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0073CF40710 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20A1818; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:10:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:10:13 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=o nUuWC/vbgmIgpptiPs5MuEPiMZ732punVmQhXQi1Qg=; b=maBQ7Vp8yYhp2F4mV RIVgWB4YApfIlV38wotYKYJgiD9AmrICX95/eRdLDNDzWoJwEpk7DLCzAgLu8Luc 7GPkJkqEFbI13Rq4KNnC72U8/J2+OynXF9pVq2UYi4SdH7vJdWaJbu/FkJ9ODsr2 fnetvYV+rRvkhe7MLzNpwf6M6KyLJJ3/R6ABLOVmoI0VLYIrbblTycWK3bEe/mcQ rD90zeQjSAYLPytU5KmCAMUU99OAmWp6GhVv4MinDHcosf3adEV0k9VY7NKk/cPr PJk68+0PxzkGLGzf5XW+2LHETrHx5azLioRsuF+QhnhpzWeE8paAFOSjlmNOmusI mP81g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=onUuWC/vbgmIgpptiPs5MuEPiMZ732punVmQhXQi1 Qg=; b=yfwKprJQbxIbX/Id0Ls6zGB6Gpta2vh/cRCZ3lB9sRtazE7m6vXu6TQh3 3lJSdzUMJLMAkCqk6D5dosIN9ua+z96lFVeCv7zhHYwWMJ5fXsgtZLtpbPv82CWj 4mlYNuQeuzrk5JEVAofpA4MIvqh4HurkudjQ2JVB0FYhh+9aWzmTGZjNV/j3LqM9 zgtrxjiT1y+seCQp1A8LtyuPq9IXjvfbB5yYpWbHpLGnhY3VHcoUwJqtSWzvBxG7 SmUTTFdyEJbhUrDLI4kg2hQduL/AFh5AjovUg8ZExptydxwk4w21cXTw1gMdM9Cu vd00l8+IjI6+tR9I4AWnol6f39GBg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Mvt9XjefSV7tkfB2XuI7IFA_VMpbNqy_0rzNAr7LIDVZH7s7lzcxLA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudehledggeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqh hmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhsrgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegt ohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehrfhgtqdgvughithhorhdrohhrghenuc fkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdeileenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgr rhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhn
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Mvt9XjRp48-Xf_jicRuSkfGev7wkf8F6hYTUiYKyA-6tHgW_EcG7YQ> <xmx:Mvt9XsU44C8kV181cGnzPkaSii6HtEGstppea9-_vVsHnHqcl6UjBg> <xmx:Mvt9XljdX2vNv-P5XGvLrOWJONIJePaFmcgU-Dlj7zp66ihpZ693yw> <xmx:Nft9Xjjgc88BB8IQNaBhxlknFQUnRsMeu26FnvuG9RzIr9Geb6grFQ>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.69]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 438CD306C1FD; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:10:10 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <29786.1585242645@localhost>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:10:08 -0400
Message-Id: <149E0E3E-287F-44B5-997A-F9DEE24A87F9@cooperw.in>
References: <CAM4esxQDdY6L7N5ieVkEfZuGwDdtUnptvuVN69Bu744jLc2-xg@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB4366823B2EE040B5C3A2FBA0B5CE0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20200325232451.GR30574@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <9AA83737-63DF-4B4F-84FC-4BC6CAC7A50C@strayalpha.com> <20200325235405.GU30574@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <B8AC5A2C-4C65-4949-9C1A-C022E1479FEE@strayalpha.com> <74a69204-481d-0c8e-a055-10956d9cefc1@joelhalpern.com> <29786.1585242645@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

(wearing no hats, personal opinion only)

> On Mar 26, 2020, at 1:10 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> (We could have a moritorium on the IESG talking about Updates.)

Fully support this. The main reason the IESG talks about this a lot is because ADs question the use of the tag. In the absence of mutable documents and since we tried multiple times to see if there could be clarity in the community about what “updates” means and failed, we could just accept that it’s an unclear tag and stop discussing it. We could even document the moratorium in an IESG statement.

Alissa

> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest