IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rfc-i] Multi-level bulleted list

Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com> Fri, 03 June 2022 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EC6C15AAE0 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654276092; bh=iBlhdpp+ExBK1lxVbOs2n/XjRWJe8YvpMWb8/3NUBTc=; h=From:Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=c06hC1BWsSb3YQaYnVDd2dWDUC/AZU1MFmTDZOcPh5UHfBn8kt/s/m3FScdIp6XAR BVSBHN1YdcSkSeoHSrUztAvWMWoJsNG0wh3VvYlrBga6uIoqKz9iK8krn2jyv+8ie1 6p5DdYJkuTpRQvfBkUlX+DogxR9Q/zQRSC7lmQuQ=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Jun 3 10:08:12 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B183C14F75F; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654276092; bh=iBlhdpp+ExBK1lxVbOs2n/XjRWJe8YvpMWb8/3NUBTc=; h=From:Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=c06hC1BWsSb3YQaYnVDd2dWDUC/AZU1MFmTDZOcPh5UHfBn8kt/s/m3FScdIp6XAR BVSBHN1YdcSkSeoHSrUztAvWMWoJsNG0wh3VvYlrBga6uIoqKz9iK8krn2jyv+8ie1 6p5DdYJkuTpRQvfBkUlX+DogxR9Q/zQRSC7lmQuQ=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133A0C14F75F for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vQwyrYaEoyrY for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68175C14F74A for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id o17so7247627pla.6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=7EGjr0w6btdcxNSX6Kd57qpm8LsIv4GWFPmDkZELEko=; b=D8rXwvZfVz/k/TMuAMynpAm3NUKQWqH6/3Lfrs2H3pMm6w0ajGZqp/qpYt1s8+KFsb d3+3aur2PhJFYlHFYImJ2ebM2hhNeZ/nJNUJkrLs/5U8cihSY/5r/TYFUXsGO1HYZvAA Ha8Dn2Nmir6O+q0fUWDJ5Kbg0s6PvzQZJCAw3ooGRa2SWrSyrTy3WbtniQAfuajouyOA i8CAQG3DtnUfxrhKt8YDiqlTZnylS/mLZcGldt0ZiEHwiodXTXjr8zGy9Q7pIv74kwK1 Nto3F2UahNEQJYV82stSYe5jkEs9RQzZA2YSb+ZB3R/a/+qZGVpp+URncLQXewMWuoNE 2mFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=7EGjr0w6btdcxNSX6Kd57qpm8LsIv4GWFPmDkZELEko=; b=cILIcXAOkUFo6ND0JErFDeSbNBIBBrDz48QJrMIBSPrrbkQnBd4D4D0GKpHIbCEhMe kIWUgaQ3jkyG10bniCCo+n+pkseUQ3vatIzUbbY4oAnMBmeSmuxuTG1PgcgF+RRE0ypW 86mDbWIwmeH/GFgqZRBLc4VQqpRselKWTkuFSthb84lMggTtpQI4WNaZJvUgYRy2AKVF ifCX+VhNVNeC9OEJzsipuyld5BqRDfHolu5XJ3al4iLPeTgLN5lNSFxj0SZKONToKsTz QY56qj1Oy4+rjJjKWuxm3L74KXbR77bdcbLBF8fcbid7MM85wHvj76J0xumofFlNOKVr UhNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QQxG4c/kvtgF4oXhYQkaE0/S/0IblL259CwhFjBFnn+VU/24u gloTn7UyqmJb73xFRnY7DWSogwZw9Jf1qhD7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyI53AiGEadffecYZcGYnoJkzl+4RQB806KskDWVA84p4aq84cVpU1AxoqUO5n47V5gS51ANQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1a88:b0:1dc:e4a1:a81e with SMTP id ng8-20020a17090b1a8800b001dce4a1a81emr47341577pjb.96.1654276087782; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (jpams-nat11.juniper.net. [193.110.49.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d21-20020a170902f15500b001640e9f638esm5641967plb.51.2022.06.03.10.08.06 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
Message-Id: <998082E2-051B-418A-B842-BDEE079B731C@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 19:08:03 +0200
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/SezVIpMCnttEqIPVwDOfiVNK980>
Subject: [rfc-i] Multi-level bulleted list
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7305738830775107014=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hello,

I see some drafts use multi-level bulleted lists. For example https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-18 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-18>, in Section 5.2:


   o  Let's take a look at the flattened pathlist used by the prefix
      "VPN-IP2", The pathlist associated with the prefix "VPN-IP2" has
      three entries.

       o The first and second entry have index "0". This is because
         both entries correspond to ePE2. Thus when hashing performed
         by the forwarding engine results in using first or the second
         entry in the pathlist, the forwarding engine will pick the
         correct VPN label "VPN-L22", which is the label advertised by
         ePE2 for the prefix "VPN-IP2".

       o The third entry has the index "1". This is because the third
         entry corresponds to ePE3. Thus when the hashing is performed
         by the forwarding engine results in using the third entry in
         the flattened pathlist, the forwarding engine will pick the
         correct VPN label "VPN-L32", which is the label advertised by
         "ePE3" for the prefix "VPN-IP2”.


I couldn’t figure out, how to create such lists with version 3 XML template.

Do you have some example (for version 3 XML template)?


Thank you,
Krzysztof




_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email