[rfc-i] Abstract for search engines
johnl at taugh.com (John Levine) Wed, 24 February 2016 03:48 UTC
From: johnl at taugh.com (John Levine)
Date: 24 Feb 2016 03:48:53 -0000
Subject: [rfc-i] Abstract for search engines
In-Reply-To: <56CC1730.8030202@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20160224034853.31119.qmail@ary.lan>
In article <56CC1730.8030202 at gmx.de> you write: ><https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-html-rfc-02#section-2> has: > >> o The abstract must be marked up or tagged in a way that popular >> search engines will extract it as a summary. > >...which is a good requirement (I asked for it :-). Back then, HTML's >description meta tag seemed to work, but that doesn't seem to be the >case anymore. Does anybody know what needs to be done nowadays? The search engine that people care about seems to be Google Scholar. They say you need meta tags at least for authors, title, and date, and it'll find the abstract in the HTML text: https://scholar.google.com/intl/us/scholar/inclusion.html#indexing If the abstract is short, you could put in in the description meta-tag, but long descriptions are likely to be ignored as SEO spam. R's, John
- [rfc-i] Abstract for search engines Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] Abstract for search engines John Levine
- [rfc-i] Abstract for search engines Julian Reschke