[rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-xml2rfc
jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)) Fri, 12 February 2016 18:00 UTC
From: jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr))
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:00:39 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-xml2rfc
In-Reply-To: <D90849C7-2B15-4BCA-94DB-B68661E2DAB9@vpnc.org>
References: <D90849C7-2B15-4BCA-94DB-B68661E2DAB9@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <49C02F2C-B19F-4EC9-834B-F0990EB5AE5B@cisco.com>
+1 -- Joe Hildebrand On 2/12/16, 10:57 AM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Paul Hoffman" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote: >Greetings. While we are waiting for your comments and questions on all >the drafts*, some of us authors have a few questions of our own. I'll >start with a minor one here. > >The use of CDATA is currently discussed in detail in <sourcecode>, and >that discussion is pointed to in <artwork> where it is appropriate as >well. A few people want this moved to its own section and those two >elements point to it. That seems OK to me. Are there any objections? > >--Paul Hoffman > > >* And boy would we like to get them before the last week of the comment >period so that others in the community can see your comments and discuss >them as well. >_______________________________________________ >rfc-interest mailing list >rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org >https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-… Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-… HANSEN, TONY L