[rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-xml2rfc

jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)) Fri, 12 February 2016 18:00 UTC

From: jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr))
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:00:39 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-xml2rfc
In-Reply-To: <D90849C7-2B15-4BCA-94DB-B68661E2DAB9@vpnc.org>
References: <D90849C7-2B15-4BCA-94DB-B68661E2DAB9@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <49C02F2C-B19F-4EC9-834B-F0990EB5AE5B@cisco.com>

+1

-- 
Joe Hildebrand








On 2/12/16, 10:57 AM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Paul Hoffman" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:

>Greetings. While we are waiting for your comments and questions on all 
>the drafts*, some of us authors have a few questions of our own. I'll 
>start with a minor one here.
>
>The use of CDATA is currently discussed in detail in <sourcecode>, and 
>that discussion is pointed to in <artwork> where it is appropriate as 
>well. A few people want this moved to its own section and those two 
>elements point to it. That seems OK to me. Are there any objections?
>
>--Paul Hoffman
>
>
>* And boy would we like to get them before the last week of the comment 
>period so that others in the community can see your comments and discuss 
>them as well.
>_______________________________________________
>rfc-interest mailing list
>rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
>https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest