IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] relevant thread

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 27 June 2019 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F97120297 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=0Aj6bGlE; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=foHgijH2
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YikMBSYukKFv for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA52712026F for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC577B816E6; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F72CB816E6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=0Aj6bGlE; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=foHgijH2
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BLgm1n23cfDd for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F474B8169B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.206.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x5RNJJPQ005549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1561677571; x=1561763971; bh=4023vxUNXlM3V0FGekXOlvyLYYagrJPRc/Ce15mzh5A=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=0Aj6bGlEoRpvw5vQoWalGMLu2bKjx+Na2vygULCDX390PVPuRn8+MhqFhCyLqyQVC qN9USYc//M4lckF7LI48Gr7daBS17tf2DIr7QPoFVafIzJiQR/fVxle1dl0U9pW+j1 fzO1MB8L5SrPgqcLadcthG19uU1J5tpCZg2iFm88=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1561677571; x=1561763971; i=@elandsys.com; bh=4023vxUNXlM3V0FGekXOlvyLYYagrJPRc/Ce15mzh5A=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=foHgijH28MED7nml2kMJ1uf6HLCTGZCztH433we5UhRxyPjtYCLSG1VDAR69sILqj ZzrDS73IcM4yxxBR4DZYI2du6ZEDARa3GcDJIpyhGLjpi8BhQkFavbP4UPE2Rlq3cf TaqfZM4Bx5I0mj8ziQrD9OzwQ8hePLMt6CbvryKs=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190627153012.0e0a9800@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:14:33 -0700
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FB0B925-1021-45A7-BB6E-C295946C4668@gmail.com>
References: <4FB0B925-1021-45A7-BB6E-C295946C4668@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] relevant thread
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi Aaron,
At 08:23 AM 26-06-2019, Aaron Falk wrote:
>Folks who subscribe to this list and not the IETF list may be 
>interested in several recent threads about the RFC Series.

It is a step back for the RFC Series.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email