IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Submissions Editor

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Thu, 12 September 2019 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E1A12086A for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQ4TUegt_SFn for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAFDB12021C for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652A7B80B8E; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720E3B80B8E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jgWygYvPoHb5 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5BC9B80B88 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id u72so13942596pgb.10 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Md6tmgbrvdzLkwegQ+pd4gxCPLPBMKeDyHHI+UHXGdg=; b=AO7gfsI4ITqLjSRLzyzwDrzwVgB1YRmVFZTobiJvTuKxbuvzgRUxFyo9D2iMeTEMwO aGsvR8kb/JMo+d7CJ3wBH6OAigRAThi5nLq8b6BlpfcYWvtF4JBHb88VEtQhqHEP3HjO 67ggDsgOJ8XBE0qbIt76Q3wBT+bnWUPLb7A4PoaQJrfJ9a5LnMxjvbb37JOEJYsysWsX s2Rs2fPo3LRROnYR7urzr1VC0E0CGIElHeRLgO780kqVaZCrVJcsifMMUsdZcNVQE4MR OyeTQSba9qT/U4l1Di5TrT/4Td+8m+5I5bLV9ZLV6RhGeL0sVYrfp4rBrt/IlVkTTDMH 5EWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Md6tmgbrvdzLkwegQ+pd4gxCPLPBMKeDyHHI+UHXGdg=; b=m3wRkzyypDGLkiLO0oeXjeINm27J25nlnbGVHk68O5bBPW2BWRXDNedhvdvl7RotU8 kesNMVAul30Kkyxl7poATqhaUOcmnJCxnayjw5ucH+GpQomJKhlWSYdejYecsikhN/91 rcYOcG3vLrwIi26ibKC+9KrLmW5RiG383p9+X1D5ulz6LiFYAteSaxpAy1z3dlGLfFL1 Tss9bWIqYPbU1bcz3vqLV8Rd6RjrA+KMNeJ+PYlBWLhZgFziO/Y6KfrcRb6dhndPvpbB PB90mJG6Jaae47xQY6bHYc7h46JLXeWFnZuEuJWAhHPMWXk+tKlsJBPeSKAZb0VnMNRs 4SSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUvjPcIf3jRmR0rwwJwDlHVFPg/XB8jRAZYqFR1d/GtZACVkkv9 jf5z9E9xFeDwtAsiKfTmqwwMUQ24dwM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx5vGDiotFK0rpxe6U2vIa2F2uOKVK2FDm6JrlTUtQlhzj4LWYJ4Sc8BiLpUPlA2YRdarXSfg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e57:: with SMTP id p23mr204265pja.126.1568315233946; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.230.64.71] (edge-gw-rwc.silverspringnet.com. [74.121.22.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s1sm42325pjs.31.2019.09.12.12.07.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: iab-chair@iab.org, execd@iab.org, ietf@ietf.org
References: <156814308493.22374.12964350262219210658.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Message-ID: <e9a47208-c847-85a3-ba1b-2135da1e1b1b@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:07:13 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <156814308493.22374.12964350262219210658.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] IAB Seeks Feedback on Independent Submissions Editor
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi -

It seems like a singularly bad idea to be doing this review at this 
time, given all the uncertainty with the RSE and the upcoming RPC 
contract re-let.   I went looking for some mention of a term for the ISE 
in the various documents (RFC's 6635, 6548 and 4846) and didn't see 
anything that said more than the IAB appointed the ISE - e.g. nothing 
that would indicate this needs to be done *right now*.

Can I suggest we defer this to after the RSE process has made forward 
progress - perhaps until say after the March meeting?    Unless of 
course Adrian has asked to be replaced?

Later, Mike


On 9/10/2019 3:18 PM, IAB Executive Administrative Manager wrote:
> As part of its oversight responsibility for the Independent Stream, the
> IAB is soliciting comments from the community on the performance of the
> Independent Submissions Editor, Adrian Farrel. The IAB is interested in
> comments on the last two years of operation of the Independent Stream
> and Adrian's activities as ISE.
>
> Please send comments to iab-chair@ab.org. In addition, please CC
> execd@iab.org.
>
> The IAB would appreciate receiving comments by Tuesday, 2019-10-08.
>
> Best regards,
> Cindy Morgan
> IAB Executive Administrative Manager
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email