Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 26 March 2020 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B173A07E8 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-N5f3FwcY5Z for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58A7C3A07C6 for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A878F40713; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB193F40713 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DWPyrAo3VYPo for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70244F40712 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id c14so6040057qtp.0 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=3VPHR47v7cHQrN/ojweYuG52BfQTDMkJbu4VosT2nUk=; b=qyjMF3U/sKzDpz/p6OhS1P9br7VMea8zEmtHsxafa/tg6oxD5Me0r4IepO5N7IgHjM NwzqrTp3kjxtCUVjL9VF4UFcbySk1uYxyJ4Are/ZliGRwiriEV81tgOLZ2kVOQkfSn9o dg1LmtP986ge+CRJE9YgCuh/DrAW84MJk7jpIpxqpKpkunAK/fiW9HYjxsR3OQRSfalN UdVSEmYpT28Wuw0a6yhEUKvuQ5wZMJSj6AobwR5yzU3HEcrrlRbEeW2RQwUpJ+kf4iNj rJL5GcLmvbJ4c0yoCRMJmBrsWh9Vxz3UxCP8D5mE6F3mH00E8ZaAaMKrhFpF6/ErzVLO 0DFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=3VPHR47v7cHQrN/ojweYuG52BfQTDMkJbu4VosT2nUk=; b=XhUIjKg0XcYVm+7mmTS/14VyINCnPvlghvvdFEc4ZXI2jldT9PQnwbJjLegSJ5jRhh 0k60HeklL5VVp9O77qxwlFQIIS8aMCRZRpIL4nB7QGADS9VA2G9j5uzvIwQOEXFEdlee h/up1x2FP3qcdAAOF7a6+k0af96fQyzxMqO5wTxdXGueAZErmZ6Xz+oKYG/fRjq07x0L On9WFk7jGmANHq+d/akim07cWgfnyPFmye9QJBQsbq9Effmx0zjJot/QjHWAzL9JVa1+ p5tKUM9JkELvXrcWFUF+PBOXDK7sTvYKjUNq1NMQXGLHFKpEBcZ6vzXmvzDtQ3DYEHHS D4nQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3merUTYdU9Fa9FXO+vihGPNTs9csdCylC9I8Gcw75v2v4vdmgN E0hCbxu0NIcWd7ollkKIKUXvAQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtMGcacFvX3vAHlpRQVo5FWP97Za+Iu12rLwRzf84e3LDjw7ScivqEEQvuydTw8D6sU7yt+HQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:24c1:: with SMTP id t1mr9487219qtt.275.1585242200350; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mithrandir.lan (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f16sm1928721qtk.61.2020.03.26.10.03.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <4EF33202-72A8-4E27-85BD-AAA716292C1A@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3622.0.6\))
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:03:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBO2vapFY9nE_RTbw83tkfWT4aSCFk-7WsH6ctPQGvznkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
References: <CAM4esxQDdY6L7N5ieVkEfZuGwDdtUnptvuVN69Bu744jLc2-xg@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB4366823B2EE040B5C3A2FBA0B5CE0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20200325232451.GR30574@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <9AA83737-63DF-4B4F-84FC-4BC6CAC7A50C@strayalpha.com> <20200325235405.GU30574@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <B8AC5A2C-4C65-4949-9C1A-C022E1479FEE@strayalpha.com> <6f5c3f41-4440-b594-a82e-9a403fe77fe3@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBO2vapFY9nE_RTbw83tkfWT4aSCFk-7WsH6ctPQGvznkw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3622.0.6)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3573025504765700204=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Mar 26, 2020, at 12:53 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> - Stop using Updates or any other such metadata entirely
> - Replace Updates with "See Also" and have it explicitly have no semantics at all

Another solution that would work: stop publishing RFCs.  :)

I really don’t see what the objection to this is.  If it works, we win.  If it doesn’t work, I don’t think we’re any worse off.  You assume that having three types will triple the rehashing, but there’s no real justification for that assumption.  Does a hash table make things slower?  This is sort of analogous: instead of one bucket, you have multiple buckets, each with a clearly defined meaning.  Even if it doesn’t dramatically improve things, it probably won’t make them significantly worse.

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest