[rfc-i] Doing something else on April 1

brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter) Sun, 03 April 2016 23:41 UTC

From: brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter)
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:41:02 +1200
Subject: [rfc-i] Doing something else on April 1
In-Reply-To: <570191DA.50101@alum.mit.edu>
References: <68406AB6-04C2-4CC1-A049-164D6094120D@vpnc.org> <5700722A.2020100@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <A2D04320-5D68-4097-BCFC-31FA4C333526@vpnc.org> <57016B46.1000903@dcrocker.net> <570191DA.50101@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <5701AA0E.4040502@gmail.com>

On 04/04/2016 09:57, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> On 4/3/16 3:13 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
>> Bottom line:
>>
>>       Refraining from a 1 April RFC because there were no worthy
>> submissions is one thing.
>>
>>       Refraining because of some vague assessment of some vague
>> discontent by some tiny set of speakers about some vague issues is not
>> merely silly; it's dangerous.  cf, 'chilling effect' and its use in
>> regards speech.
> 
> I was disappointed. I thought maybe it had to do with Apr 1 falling within the blackout period.

The moral of the story is: send your April 1 drafts to the RFC Editor around New Years.

   Brian