Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 02 December 2016 09:32 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA221295A0
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:32:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key)
reason="fail (message has been altered)"
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id k9gfxmAVt9Kt
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F7AC1295E8
for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>;
Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED017B80243;
Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:32:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127EEB80243;
Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:32:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id iUGi44eJpYcq; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:32:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x243.google.com (mail-qk0-x243.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::243])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB7BCB80242;
Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:32:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id x190so29736066qkb.0;
Fri, 02 Dec 2016 01:32:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=wUNh/Gmb71VdlEVwsXU+2L22dR7qB9QvH3XUrSF0KwM=;
b=GWtJxB2sg0nsadteuzezBwK6ZB7ZAHZqzqziUAyzdzIPazg1dcF9yX2Ah8aYobpBpz
NekVr82y3NESD6wzmsoae+YMHTRW1mBp3XkVS/uJwxYEwG4tiYw+LIjHz+b+NFw+2zD4
9CoBi6ug89X9XKnbjIfw2CtszKDdc/C7L5plp60clk5G6yNbMZRpTrYTgYZ+udyyhJUf
oh+Dfl6TimQ+g0fIoce0IAPpgqPtnZkmlKJVmQFNSoH9g5IzX/TEYdAuVczVfjD8pcNy
qluvFxspKDEdieo/OqrSS3nKR+Re3rI+kRxjUzLjAg2sj3bNP4ucL+m6K63U0CJfT/nh
a3ig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=wUNh/Gmb71VdlEVwsXU+2L22dR7qB9QvH3XUrSF0KwM=;
b=PwZHRlspUtazgH+1RTDQa1MqGJQ/kPUCBqGXFXOj79rDqBzAfE7Unce20lAerU/x4J
1gCgX7EBX76WqwlzfMbKu7JOblHM/hczf51Ryq+raRm0VlDh9i671jibD86qRsv6a8Eu
+TO/7mFEwWOABrO/Tw8u3/yiHLX+mVltBnCUDzp4Z8s8RFOtNDDdJ7nB5g426e6jvUmi
u98QE9zfS1/yjC8r51c7acI9xLlyI/R9skzs8k3kIMzJBRXVRdZ2N0AJOmrLBZMt0ooh
IBwWrVa4lPrG39p+XAbmPWH4cYOZcHonsxsvgYWRJC9d9lcTMqa9+vYPyPblYml/dpFY
JAuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00rprnC+mHezyoLdkn9H7+sh3XSMaGf4RX9zj1T4XbXlkYwRihiZis3LQ2s25GRoYWeYtZ2/4PpJqCEug==
X-Received: by 10.55.126.193 with SMTP id z184mr5779069qkc.115.1480671158911;
Fri, 02 Dec 2016 01:32:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.38.233 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:32:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DB2453E2-8F62-4D5F-B9A2-A1B306F962CF@gmail.com>
References: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
<04f701d24c79$3df584e0$b9e08ea0$@olddog.co.uk>
<DB2453E2-8F62-4D5F-B9A2-A1B306F962CF@gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 20:32:37 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWBKp9u15UKnNUEfuq7dQWbnEX4oqmzBNs-MiDxY+o3uA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions."
<rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org,
"Heather Flanagan \(RFC Series Editor\)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
On 2 December 2016 at 20:28, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > I prefer crafting the Acknowledgement section by hand, because often it is not just a list of names. “Thanks to Jane for contributing the test vectors. Special thanks to Julian for contributing the ABNF”. Yeah, frankly I think that this is a bit of a mess: https://tlswg.github.io/tls13-spec/#contributors Yes, all those people deserve acknowledgment (except me), but it's almost the longest section in the document now. _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Dan York
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Russ Housley
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Yoav Nir
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Joe Hildebrand
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Russ Housley
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… Larry Masinter
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Julian Reschke