IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS

"Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 01 December 2016 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89A1129D4D for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:29:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R0YvN6ls71sY for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:29:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C457129C94 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:21:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3207DB801E6; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:21:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04527B801E6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:21:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQTx-uDcTBUm for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D335EB801E5 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C731E5654 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:21:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L2In5B8nW0rO for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:21:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Heathers-MacBook-Pro.local (c-50-159-75-65.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [50.159.75.65]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 928A51E5653 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:21:34 -0800 (PST)
From: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Message-ID: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:21:35 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hello all,

A first draft of the CSS that will be embedded in the new HTML output
format is ready for feedback. The developer and I do not consider this
done. In particular, things that need work include:

* Mobile layouts will need further polish.
* The index is not aligned with the other sections.
* Compact lists have been given only a preliminary treatment. (And lists
in general could use a bit more attention.)
* Notes have not been given any treatment
* Certain classes have not been accounted for (e.g. ".finalized").

Given the restrictions around JavaScript, features like hamburger menus
(those three or four lines that appear when the display is too small to
show something like a table of contents or sidebar) are not available.

Sample document:
https://rfc-format.github.io/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/sample.html

If you have suggestions or recommendations, please add them as an issue
in github.

Issue tracker:
https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues

If you have time and interest, you can be of even more assistance by
creating additional sample files according to the HTML spec so that the
CSS developer has more content to test against.

Thanks for your time and attention!
Heather Flanagan, RSE
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email