[rfc-i] sourcecode/@src
julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Tue, 16 February 2016 19:22 UTC
From: julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:22:18 +0100
Subject: [rfc-i] sourcecode/@src
In-Reply-To: <92F34E05-695E-4C76-8626-E78A4456539A@cisco.com>
References: <92F34E05-695E-4C76-8626-E78A4456539A@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56C376EA.2020908@gmx.de>
On 2016-02-16 20:13, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote: > New thread for new topic. > > On 2/16/16, 11:49 AM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Julian Reschke" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote: > > > >> PS: I really think we should get rid of sourcecode/@src. There's no >> point to have a special inclusion mode here. > > I think the two preptool steps we've talked about make it useful (intuit filename, intuit file type). Both of those would be difficult to do with x:include. Using x:include, you'd need to specify filename and type separately (in addition to the include directive). I don't think that is a big burden that justifies making the language more complicated than it needs to be... Best regards, Julian
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@src Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@src Julian Reschke