[rfc-i] sourcecode/@src

julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Tue, 16 February 2016 19:22 UTC

From: julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:22:18 +0100
Subject: [rfc-i] sourcecode/@src
In-Reply-To: <92F34E05-695E-4C76-8626-E78A4456539A@cisco.com>
References: <92F34E05-695E-4C76-8626-E78A4456539A@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56C376EA.2020908@gmx.de>

On 2016-02-16 20:13, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
> New thread for new topic.
>
> On 2/16/16, 11:49 AM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Julian Reschke" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>> PS: I really think we should get rid of sourcecode/@src. There's no
>> point to have a special inclusion mode here.
>
> I think the two preptool steps we've talked about make it useful (intuit filename, intuit file type).  Both of those would be difficult to do with x:include.

Using x:include, you'd need to specify filename and type separately (in 
addition to the include directive). I don't think that is a big burden 
that justifies making the language more complicated than it needs to be...

Best regards, Julian