[rfc-i] SVG document - stray text

ajs at anvilwalrusden.com (Andrew Sullivan) Wed, 27 July 2016 22:55 UTC

From: ajs at anvilwalrusden.com (Andrew Sullivan)
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:55:41 -0400
Subject: [rfc-i] SVG document - stray text
In-Reply-To: <9B7CB2FC-AA41-43A2-A372-37A5F1453B4A@charter.com>
References: <8EEDB1CB-7C62-456B-A0AD-39FD944267C9@charter.com> <b90ad676-3a9e-4680-3cbf-d5ff1e3c064a@rfc-editor.org> <9B7CB2FC-AA41-43A2-A372-37A5F1453B4A@charter.com>
Message-ID: <20160727225541.GB1218@mx2.yitter.info>

I thought Dave caught this and said it was the usual editor pass
that'd fix it?

A

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:42:50PM +0000, Howard, Lee L wrote:
> I think right now it looks like nobody on the IAB read it. So I think it'd be embarrassing to send it for last call as is.  That's where we are now, right?
> 
> Lee
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On Jul 27, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) <rse at rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 7/27/16 7:32 AM, Howard, Lee L wrote:
> >> Before we send for further comment, the Abstract in draft-iab-rfc-02 has
> >> stray text in the opening words:
> >> 
> >> .  Maybe the text in section 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-svg-rfc-02
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I wouldn't want to announce without cleaning that up.
> > 
> > Hi Lee,
> > 
> > Is this something we can clean up during AUTH48, or do you want it fixed
> > before the IAB does it's final approval for publication?
> > 
> > -Heather
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com