Re: [rfc-i] Mailing lists overlap - merge them ?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 07 February 2021 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91603A1363; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:28:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NmCBm-toQMdJ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:28:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55BAF3A136A; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:28:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABA7F40757; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:28:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AE6F40757 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:28:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lTgXeS5X6bTC for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:28:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8039CF40755 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:28:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id m6so8470730pfk.1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 13:28:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O8rXJM7gGJj77whw/2ZEHOBUh7L+8Xy7g6SYcyXNuv0=; b=S8XxgL1w6ebYvWiusgUyHcUTujeIjWYtYruiN9H8KuIRwQJQLMV+g9dFryCFVKdTNa McYgS1RqjCl+fH7fYxO7P4fTDKBihrqlQE7a2RfeN4OVTGbRTYddCYGhbogL/g26mUvR EcNvR12QotBlDqe5z9ttbOfu19sYy7KZXKrLKoY3dQgIdg8rcG2WCt+YRn+jFII/oLol aevOfFx3O4PPMBtl9UvGj8va6kNFJ+Nx3aPJYU+aZ544GcR8OyX7nj2iUpjjIai4VXnL oiLl5KO0qCsgHs3BqGlQYNC4OO2VswwMmQk0K1sR/3+mADx1fyVMuSsteJuKjUhVxgUv 4P1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O8rXJM7gGJj77whw/2ZEHOBUh7L+8Xy7g6SYcyXNuv0=; b=KhpLS28VIg3HZV3Ol2A0JNCJtU7q4PgST3PQAR9UbNyfjiRWkxqi2gvgQXLo7P6Xwd iokZeGlY6vwCjHAuNiAfdbLD93fu4IHTrBu6BZGynsEr0HCMsuaEtCsqyZlbYD9AqXz2 U4hyXMEV/CEKBF1VH2YXHH6jN02nrC7xYr/B8CU9Fdwu8RtVEup52CzgSvbsbECB6vUy hXfoe6d1aXc3jtozJ8AuAzdvgwxUkq1/jnNU4yemYiHKS4uFiXoHVY/eg3acz8BwnuzE plcgJB4xfB6L/5uJX/nohDSMBaNOfgAtVRyF+gUPubxBz/fjddadteu3JvCsta3/3IvB SIFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533GLr4cOHNS6txYJte9+1d/IW7i6yerrbUn6vO9ZrSDt8x8k180 OIcYb+YgQkaxjXgBkh9t150=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+H32rxa2b4dC3xqSC+xo9JuKQ0fEYaqoXTRs6vhDHlJZ2LiTa7xLZFFIm+G5WXsqYDOmemA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:515:: with SMTP id 21mr6307721pgf.231.1612733306476; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 13:28:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.131.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a8sm9824624pjs.40.2021.02.07.13.28.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Feb 2021 13:28:25 -0800 (PST)
To: Roger Price <roger@rogerprice.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2102071913570.6375@maria.rogerprice.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b582c3d3-4a2d-2349-6b46-adbaeda2e819@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:26:21 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2102071913570.6375@maria.rogerprice.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Mailing lists overlap - merge them ?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 08-Feb-21 09:16, Roger Price wrote:
> On Wed Feb 3 19:32:42 PST 2021, IETF Executive Director wrote:
> 
>> In October-November 2020 the IETF Administration LLC ran a survey of I-D 
>> authors on the formats and tools that they use. ...
> 
>> I recommend that any discussion on this subject takes place on either 
>> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org or tools-discuss at ietf.org as appropriate.
> 
> This survey is very interesting, but the regular double posting shows
> that the two mailing lists overlap too much.  I suggest merging them.

Bad idea. This topic does indeed interest both lists, but rfc-interest
covers much, much more than tools-discuss (and is not an IETF list, in fact). Also, tools-discuss covers more that document prep tools.

   Brian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest