[rfc-i] Question about changes introduced by erratum

Damian Lukowski <rfc@arcsin.de> Fri, 20 March 2020 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08BB3A03F8 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=arcsin.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tEkDnjWpF55p for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFA3A3A03EA for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A8EF40719; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AAFF40719 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arcsin.de
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xMadNHYQfL_4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sigil.arcsin.de (sigil.arcsin.de [46.38.233.110]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C414F40709 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=arcsin.de; h= content-language:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:mime-version:date:date:message-id:subject:subject :from:from:x-amavis-category; s=dkim01; t=1584719859; x= 1586534260; bh=Oui1yaCn77hARARx7XIgMN4BMCQbTTHm22lYLfA6H78=; b=a MM0z8RDaGjQMdg0XPH2ho4s5VgTk2AJwgPCWk7zn0VrI5RWEDBcIDHikVUsA0QmH ODdYOZGRkwfH6cZT38690GPQE0fSBZydBDOFsMqeb2+rNmyA+nQ2grCrGrp7GcZm P6iwY2VWernwvGc+spHNPaOiA3oxJLF2vYJ2sn6XgI=
X-Amavis-Category: sigil.arcsin.de; category=CleanTag
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
From: Damian Lukowski <rfc@arcsin.de>
Message-ID: <358069c2-4654-83cb-f800-4e3e33952c7f@arcsin.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:57:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: [rfc-i] Question about changes introduced by erratum
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi,

I have a question about a change in an RFC introduced by a specific
erratum (5435). Is this the right list to ask such question?

Regards
 Damian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest