IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 25 March 2020 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAF33A0E3A for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=cisco.com header.b=WIDsFNOq; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=LCGdAWZD
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J5q178BjhcBl for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA5DE3A0593 for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D55F40714; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F2FF40714 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=WIDsFNOq; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=LCGdAWZD
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pSitT_D70w4r for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38CBFF40712 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9660; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1585177966; x=1586387566; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=/b8xP2iABK9W/QboDBn7Tk7cMLIrZe1vzrj9Ih9DE4E=; b=WIDsFNOqkFa3+Y/nQOMzELW5zI9QtsplIl1qhTH1TNiPJmFjJE/n3G8z 1xrw0Qn59z1WDaFpKqA+ExdpbDPnjT56/fwO1dVkpVcUeLflbPWcwPUf9 VPkZXZqyleg6u98rvn8oAbfXT79bCcFQclL5zHob140fkm9SKHwwhVBZn Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:tEPdkBOWwbyjJl3eWpQl6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEu60/l0fHCIPc7f8My/HbtaztQyQh2d6AqzhDFf4ETBoZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBjhM//ucys8NM9DT1RiuXq8NBsdFQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ANFgBP5Hte/4UNJK1mHgELHIMgL1AFbFggBAsqhBmDRQOKdU6CEZM8hGKCUgNUCgEBAQwBAS0CBAEBhEQCF4IRJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQUEbYVWDIVjAQEBAQMSEQoTAQE4DwIBCBEEAQErAgICMB0IAgQBEggagwWBfk0DLgGjWAKBOYhidYEygn8BAQWFMRiCDAmBOIwvGoFBP4ERR4JNPoRNgw8ygiyQd4V4JJlGCoI8lyWCTJkSjxGBUJokAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFYcBWDJ1AYDY4dg3OKVXSBKY1pAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,306,1580774400"; d="scan'208,217";a="467984757"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 25 Mar 2020 23:12:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02PNCdA2013628 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 23:12:39 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:12:39 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:12:38 -0500
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:12:38 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=aAB2XsZ0pAqMiDWgQ5J+7mj62MLAN8tVVXGeZriQYJCHLOvcCKxonf85eyslFxfvGGZslWO6vTq9dT/PISSi3oVVXYE1pFprnBY65yS9uJFDOqxZNnJ9uZ9CB15q8m87u/hm5+vs0S4eM8J2DOXk9R1QcFKAFgdP6e2d64ez2t5SXFesZ19gAdrovSSteq7AAlPwxHUXcO1OTWByPiRANMXLQH3OpJm2ipmO6UECB3heLhFzDjvvruBJ2Vd1QCFpy3ZcfTCotl+U4r5l+/xZewQqalztgwkRzwf4WIux1KQ0JTd4YyM9SSs6EAznteJTqbVn+ot1GGTExX2C6Jew1A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=/b8xP2iABK9W/QboDBn7Tk7cMLIrZe1vzrj9Ih9DE4E=; b=MlbXs1rXVSa1ryxZlwYuClMG/N2l1UZxpvZPSJHqmzJVTbXz4OHneAjI5gE/x9Zw3K8JTfGHruGDC5agHRd2JcazGA2pGz0njY4LCGIzdKJzE216qHfa1U4YCbl2sSTov5q6N5C4OgSc/nSWXwQ/lhdCRxW+5bopbcLsu5a8bO2LTmYeeRWGBW4UCa0KP79jCkUOVkPH6eDPmGTpz7WvyXEX4dzSN2y2jRUB9emE2PTZZCCdqPk6ZZUPaTS3XbfnPLCcchhsTQb0LjCUhlHQRkfyTJfrHqmSIixkk/1naacPGMEa+MJHUWoC+Ch9CtQ8NNe9RdY80QfypWV8JGKNeQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=/b8xP2iABK9W/QboDBn7Tk7cMLIrZe1vzrj9Ih9DE4E=; b=LCGdAWZDan12vXh2iW+VMeew6idt/RWG3eUROhPMRljsh8ArirIlJBE0J2/sruJJ6MqbCjJCGbNB+QrhtEwGkKGHimvGtubjWw5jr6Uc86GencdR2068Irb5swCYJLnl0sTbfTxKi9i4mN5GblxWHvH+9CiVwA+bw8xSs3QFp3s=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:190::17) by MN2PR11MB3551.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ea::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2856.19; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 23:12:37 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3:2164:a8e2:33b3]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3:2164:a8e2:33b3%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2835.023; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 23:12:37 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/
Thread-Index: AQHWAvaaMxeoHqG97k6dhpr74g7STahZ7pOg
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 23:12:37 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB4366823B2EE040B5C3A2FBA0B5CE0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAM4esxQDdY6L7N5ieVkEfZuGwDdtUnptvuVN69Bu744jLc2-xg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxQDdY6L7N5ieVkEfZuGwDdtUnptvuVN69Bu744jLc2-xg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c8:1003::1a9]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: aef8fd58-0d40-4e68-f6a1-08d7d1120259
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3551:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3551BF27F6503341465F30F8B5CE0@MN2PR11MB3551.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 0353563E2B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(316002)(55016002)(33656002)(86362001)(186003)(8676002)(8936002)(71200400001)(81166006)(81156014)(478600001)(110136005)(2906002)(76116006)(66946007)(7696005)(53546011)(15650500001)(6506007)(9686003)(5660300002)(52536014)(66446008)(66556008)(66476007)(64756008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3551; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: irNophoSPFsCErF+LteNcBRbgl76vVnU7XTIPHhLIF+H70OZN0CmI79awFhVnmEc50kXNlfoZkUF1BFzm56hosrZi8gg9e4bqKoLZ9kvB4JyrLDpdHLNZp1UkBvoIgHKnZ9fiVERGjfKKGwZ+mCCMSUv/fMR5H+A5d2+LdPd3z/VcF9l3Qx+c9zsYPrNPLLJ9EHvs5wyQBgE+x9bKK7whimtwn/2BnumbVruMY8hhlVD3f3T512uxyT8PgBUmp+zU9bc1Ujbs+7zPGa4CHTu21ZhYlhiOkN4pANPBtknjRYkMX2pRH5kYHfw30+7SRHrSpWWjv0qasqc7aPXeHiIrd53f8xMK7uIi26S4NgXpE/bsAB4LDolpdZzmk+nWhkLBGA1p+Y598a5Mb3Su8gJ4H5eGGJW91H6BHfBUc73iHLLaHPA3x5Fvp1eFNdfXhiv
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: i8PXUM5atsTeWk7h/GCSPE4pLI50ynMDR/+9BAs9eIK9K4EYTNUfHFH6r74a8C33gbodN622N6VbnLND10fXtF7Q1itisTYwpMOOFr3r5t4HrmRS3qPm7wVO6Dcmas1d2XWpokV+TeA9b/jHFa5FtGzcL2PLO132ESbJKQ3ck1E=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: aef8fd58-0d40-4e68-f6a1-08d7d1120259
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Mar 2020 23:12:37.1943 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: p7g47NLz+CkBoXWGZWTcjYxWSnGttXPn/dP2LG0GJCpa95Kv2gtNYMBu0tdhBtvz1OGZVyfmvBQwJFNntQSMRA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3551
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0660660452237777989=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


From: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org> On Behalf Of Martin Duke
Sent: 25 March 2020 22:41
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

What I was going to say in the queue:

Like mnot, I think Updated should mean "Amended". It may be worth it to change the term just to create awareness to tighten the meaning.
[RW]
+1 to Updated meaning Amended, but I think that we could keep the tag name the same, but just specify exactly what its behaviour is.

But I dislike the idea of having "Extends" and "See Also". I foresee foundational documents (like RFC 793) with a few pages of RFC references before the text starts. That is useless. Plus the formal existence of these categories will encourage people to use them.
[RW]
I like the idea of “Extends” but not “Extended By”.  I.e. I think that it is useful for an RFC to indicate which base spec it is extending, but I don’t think that the base spec needs to indicate which optional RFCs it has been extended by.

If we would like better forward-tracing of standards evolution through time, I would prefer if the datatracker and rfc-editor pages simply listed the times the RFC was cited by other RFCs both normatively and informatively. I think that would be sufficient and automatable.
[RW]
I see “Extends” as something different to Normative reference.

Regards,
Rob


TLDR, rename Updated to Amended, build the citation tool, and call it done.

Martin





_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email