[rfc-i] How to indent artwork with surrounding block

brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter) Wed, 17 February 2016 03:57 UTC

From: brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:57:20 +1300
Subject: [rfc-i] How to indent artwork with surrounding block
In-Reply-To: <970A412E-B227-420F-8EE7-611A228D93E1@vpnc.org>
References: <76FD8A33-4FE3-4333-8E7C-BE2E274C1D24@cisco.com> <970A412E-B227-420F-8EE7-611A228D93E1@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <56C3EFA0.9010208@gmail.com>

On 17/02/2016 16:27, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> In re-reading this thread, I am now of the belief that we don't need <example> or even <sourcecode type="example">. The various
> RFCs that discuss code in RFCs don't make any differentiation between code and examples, so there is no need for us to in the v3
> format.
> 
> If this changes in the future based on some (prolonged) discussion about IPR, we can make a change to the format then. Trying to
> predict what might be desired is a really bad idea.

To be clear, are you assuming that tags like <CODE BEGINS> and <CODE ENDS>
will continue to be inserted manually by individual authors, as part of the
<sourcecode> text?

I have no problem with that, but it needs to be explicit.

   Brian