IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Errata Reference Format

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 05 May 2017 06:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1361F1273B1 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n6XfRxZDGI4Q for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D77127097 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE8EB8177E; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED950B8177E; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y-Clie7HBbJ4; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 354E8B8177D; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.114.133]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LgqEs-1dsWwc2VHi-00oF1D; Fri, 05 May 2017 08:29:56 +0200
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <148916689952.6827.6792653811413720687.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <383fa41c-e289-8045-7c1f-fcdcd8cc8445@rfc-editor.org> <291ffdb4-36b0-691b-498e-9eaaa2f9a239@gmx.de> <47e064ca-495e-9665-dfb2-8a6cc07a6b55@rfc-editor.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <ea3c8e85-0763-657e-e0e6-81d90315bd90@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 08:29:54 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <47e064ca-495e-9665-dfb2-8a6cc07a6b55@rfc-editor.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Y0pHEYAj6ZlIHy2gM7MK3jac08RK5PXMcoyK3+kyaak5Y0rGU6v zs0pd/dGeVWyX4Lx6Cr5SmULBU5CnunOt6fMooPO6TxR5y2AtDgHelRSUUlwsPOPAlm5S1Q Tq7T7LZXbjvqcci8OwhQWYZGt6pcDdt9m6ZMhReGQoz8uimpgsx/6YygvfNBR8oDIRdUcIt dzCC4CF4hvjSvPBZ/Hrxg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:cTydKh5cKYc=:+I1trvrASNptVdRqyEx/VE 7uKH6V0eK6wu1UxiRw9u3uWNjrY0uXYB5+xXg0lhKPtU3FrOqvxO3tPnU1uj/G0SAFIIJnYQw u6nXsEKy5xwPq7/Vn7+LsrLIHRcJqUj8km8ATu8VlRx0haR+g6IvhGR+7lwfatP6hYeZOhN5c blzh3yzxmuhYbH4z4vN5vR131I0vCSwXZVXKk8CeXOUddp/0b3ILNIY6GsmPmKPA8tBE9AeJl skJfqKc9b7H3NcFGM0dkTs9qDn8LK2nyoX2em2aR27NcaVB1H8JS4TgIVrv2KYjVs4LKlGdBj At8KJzsGK/fsFXlhow6dC3Vjr9NMbHd6BoJlpVjF0bX2P+o8GNkAn4aKQKlztKqdJhyB1XJcy YBPeSXeDwedUkMNhrKiGkHdH5tQt+PYDPVzZ73bC7AxA8zKIlWK/4asxecurXCmKJdFpOCZf6 Ub+9csxW4RImLSfZ5B7f4WLt2PJDWxRRrJ6kX0kdnzzOzNVl6b3gbndCDFyAwkjJOkxRb1OB9 KfggWt+u/SiMjLnZnrv+y6YWSAyu4inNNEQyqdhIOFr3LyNev5XTO4vwlDQAjXRVFi3eFPHcl Wk+PePN70LlXk1pUyhZQ6s5Rb4SOm+0khbXmYO/epDtgT4Mx/KZw+wsUxuZWyNKk1LNFNlnpj Ka5hXDT1c5VfXSWcdjX+mo0bylbktNC1M+4w/qoo3pEuMDUzORxdzPwmujlvCgABWmIRRD3jn IYb8+7hPkGo3oXCWOSAY/lZBXV9uylJtwaRsYhYKnAWwLjXu1NEJWuqD7XAkwrKP+blFuLmSJ v18k/qf
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Errata Reference Format
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 2017-05-05 01:33, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> ...
> Hello all,
>
> The effort to make better, stable errata URLs is done. The format of the
> URL is:
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid####
>
> (e.g., https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4920)

Awesome.

> Note that for the concatenated records (the "Full Records" in a search
> on the RFC Editor website) those remain URL search strings.

I assume you mean "all errata for RFC x"? I think it would be good to 
also have a nicer URI for these, but it's not as important than the 
actual erratum ID...

> ...

Best regards, Julian




_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email