IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Tao [3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 30 March 2022 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B863A1102 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1648674314; bh=PAGKBfolbnXsOgkrmvMgZ04AWxBgBUn+MQoj9UQNJrA=; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=AdhJ1bq+/LEfiHeKXVxN+Y0ZTok53yDyt5gVIyakQBgxRG60Qjh8PArd20vprKaxU +fjGWnzmowUPSWOsn+6swPgcfdS3NTMI/zYw+H8cv9dggkWoqBcveoyn9Cydm0uBnD TBzaLnFx7E5ayfaLE4dYHLzi7QV9X4Dyae/eCxOA=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 30 14:05:05 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570BF3A1125; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1648674299; bh=PAGKBfolbnXsOgkrmvMgZ04AWxBgBUn+MQoj9UQNJrA=; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=a8DZq7qwWfLg+KXATls3tZpbHdn371jHWfpKA3m53ueWJNWeEeUaIi1qEXzFA6//1 7BAxYVWs4Grm/+h6bfE+V98ZZ/l+nMGECnOjiR6S9qYBasvKoGSxSrTuKDyu4/Wglk I2dbRjoE4iGLF53QpjEfTxKNK2NaVMCpJM9mexb4=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1023A109A for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4INiHy0niaFv for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8C0D3A109F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id c15-20020a17090a8d0f00b001c9c81d9648so1392718pjo.2 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m3HFLlJuZP1HOf55RXcHWr4kbLs46oyQCj8g/APambw=; b=cE/IiMQZkaiGokWzprcqLVOKuHyeoMaFBYntGj312QTcLr8b4q7IutJWkvv3Kw3McN NqBpmR0OVrbFrStJ1OLC2AZw30/jVhabvkojeP8kj8nYl2DjfPxXNxoAdZvJufRmaLMy MUCMxv82me70CyseJk+nZpKMfAbbZtRfwjYws3K5POSCPhpYn4ggcjLwqybQjqiOOxfl 0DTvlqaE6n8lJKjuVz+EyYmOYmDMfUZ3XqoyY0PR/ReLwlT5w6HznGOF49QxCEfaH6+C 6SjNIxEXzfRJCCnKBvW7ZtIYxc9cdjk0fuyDg9QoSqdq7i4fwsILrt+x8kS5mRBhGd76 OiUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m3HFLlJuZP1HOf55RXcHWr4kbLs46oyQCj8g/APambw=; b=aWJoEJ0f/cmqi7M1BOGZrA+qiPUxlzJczr2l6fcvp8LkXti9GqN5vfpy4aKdnNkeVU skfA3euJ+FjWBru+b75zgVT3yDn3Gs8ViebBlwQ2FCsjLUiFp29PL7MNCN44zSnoi/37 TSSJTgEor94L4Nd/oKy7XCKaCiXADrV4xNVyK1wXv88vDw/iWEMIB3a3ym3ELbVshzvK A+l8o8YH89CTXP7pmkoNc7gj/SdHDUoxH4BnLi3c+bj///pRiZ71014KEt2gRpJR6q5W G/RqOEWyADoKVXmBknGA1rmTAWQFuLIl1LDx0lYBW24p46hT2YCegsTnLI0BThnr4LPA FwvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530sXNvVqza6qm1+LG0x22RtXspWxjJc5OECtevVgy40T3xN+Zvz 9tGjWLrSB0h/tgfFEvgKzSWljRd9vegZJg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3SR5Qka9wo0guuOa06WPMMcN+fTjBkJKiEPcVcTOQdXF427DC5kSHhiOdEcJLV4/mvziqig==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b782:b0:153:e0dc:755e with SMTP id e2-20020a170902b78200b00153e0dc755emr1666566pls.1.1648674290752; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b21-20020a17090a551500b001b90ef40301sm7926361pji.22.2022.03.30.14.04.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
References: <Yj2d4DJMFWJOxoZa@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <317196df-3363-36c9-2421-02d9e229f664@joelhalpern.com> <CO1PR11MB488130CFF42A9F309AE1E212D81A9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <95b5dab0-3eb5-536d-85fc-d428f26364ed@joelhalpern.com> <CABcZeBOSMRffY6cXjwn7A6d=JWDJmmBrgHxiPD-XRMTMazOjLw@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB48812B0C5B88C190FB4A28ECD81D9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <7042bc99-5d14-993c-198b-1080b4ff5636@gmail.com> <CH0PR02MB8291A7A9598871412C035882D61E9@CH0PR02MB8291.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <39A3A9C9-5EED-4E44-9695-6186C5A3F7AC@akamai.com> <5abeddcf-1209-1dd1-a9c3-221ad1b78d98@gmail.com> <2fd7c18f-f4e2-374c-b852-8b12fef0f033@joelhalpern.com> <E0F6BFF3-CB79-4721-A69A-5847DAC6CBC3@akamai.com> <e957bd2c-4d90-a32b-8825-39c1d015dbba@joelhalpern.com> <E5A01BD0-98FA-46C1-B03A-A6356BFA4654@akamai.com> <495c56ba-e4e1-2044-5424-823efc49195d@joelhalpern.com> <F03C49EC-6BEE-4718-A3EF-68DE8DA756D5@akamai.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <49a48870-dd01-5e59-c39d-a980aca5cb12@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:04:45 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F03C49EC-6BEE-4718-A3EF-68DE8DA756D5@akamai.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/bScoY8cHrclDP_eXMCZxs29rO6M>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Tao [3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)]
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 31-Mar-22 04:17, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>    As I understand it, while you are one of the editors, the actual content
>      decision resides with the IESG?  You will not be pushing anything to the
>      IETF web site without their review?
> 
> RFC 6722 is still in effect, yes.

And that's fine. All I'm saying is that for what looks like a fairly large
update of something we suggest that all newcomers read, a community review
is normal IETF practice.

As for the diffs, this is actually quite hard as a direct result of moving
the Tao from RFC to web-content format. Is the current posted version
available in Markdown somewhere?

    Brian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email