IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] some thoughts about errata

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 09 February 2017 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959EE12957E for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:47:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mMAvjUy7yY92 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:47:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F92D12958E for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:47:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2183B800F0; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:47:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE052B800F0; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:47:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xk82HkYwMgmT; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FC16B800B8; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:47:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.99.73]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mhej1-1cpyUw2RKV-00Mp9n; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 19:47:33 +0100
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <53C0FEEE.9060903@gmx.de> <49a49c57-14f5-0a38-698b-c6e1a9586bb5@gmx.de> <a11d6e4f-d0c2-9722-2616-5274bc939a5f@rfc-editor.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <782376ec-3b4e-9bbd-e2c0-18c60b3ea20b@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 19:47:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a11d6e4f-d0c2-9722-2616-5274bc939a5f@rfc-editor.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:HC6/xrhT/hbtzPSbOAxpI4JOWQT03aQWfvfxoUWgK4zA9bh/9wo gsNoAJeA4fCA775nEIkCDnlzHL8IGYovy6fwSElma4v3+XI7fIzFs5rqAS9ZtFiI57Ki0w5 aeVGY+dtuaivK8eSw+NruZXaZ0Ese+Cj15jPUQUJ+32k2rV0NfZ7kv3/1cifCx766ZI/4Kt Q3f1rxjTI10qL90+JYQIg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:L9F8T9bwffg=:KVyNoGNt9hqX4jgUExn6OS 8n/7m13Dvxy9qobv0bBEkLsQgybG3ISo++Cy5X6jRHne5nugFPHczNmgBEYRo/2kutnwa6s4p JhhM2VcodZLoycReulWUzvNPQwqXBNhKP7IAGUxi3Lx8aFg5rpNIXx9HdvwtYTE3x2vDAO9qy BnWPKGBfV1t5Jug5VcmGAI9NmoIxPmg6EIdeY+EISARjgpPphQaejYqTeuWdHrvpuUSHy7Z6F ex0tK0mFjODtu7KwDJHw3uOCt6zn4dGoqhhrqLqWqeqHKrAFvXHaxUSn2zXX/SzclJkl+5SHY 7AjsBnwvi91xufpK6k/U646IFuPq15uNyG46WN2vyxlwXVGNnp1nf+E0o1rc30W+NFXNtLaLl S+o4WPUrFIuKqF4CjZnxMKt4/PVxC4oIrZxVjmm+xMkFyilyW0uB+56nsI2mytw5dMbHSgOWr 3d1lCrnvg//06qbsZ00/QGZcxcew8yohgdCxdOz8WNr/pms7LBpENeh9H/UiP5pIqdfxKMo+e lEnN07uqfTSJXyts1jYUKDQd5Q7nnsgQIIbsmB9vlytf4aa/tPUBnnU/kXxAlqOEhCxqiRKQe q5wBX7Xpm9dU1JosNZf2702z6SAgadLjavfWMyZaaYtkA2EBq2zqXnh30CYUkat6nvvcTFLNV FHBGIFAKTy//+mYwLOSiFtbm5CNAfcMf0Nj0FrYLPsqX7Yt1sWqIjB6Cz1glRnQyAWB8D8dGl Pe1xSrYlFX/HwPmxkw1X7CDEcs96HsGFfrgW2KEJYs0cjctOwfeQGHzSwE4v9dc9xu8GYVoka jwilqkh
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] some thoughts about errata
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 2017-02-09 00:41, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> ...
> Hi Julian,
>
> I think the suggestions are doable, though I'll defer to the developer
> when we have one working on the system. We need to do at least some
> basic updates in order to support the new formats, and I'll see if one
> or both of these suggestions can fit into that work. If either turn out
> to be a bigger piece of work, then we'll need to hold off until we have
> the resources to work on it. Right now, most of our available funds and
> developer time are working on format related tools.
>
> -Heather
> ...

FWIW, setting up stable URIs might be as easy as editing the Apache config.

That said, somebody needs to give the errata page some maintenance, see 
<https://redbot.org/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata_search.php%3Frfc%3D7230>.

For instance, the response is marked to be non-cacheable.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email