Re: [rfc-i] Hebrew contact information example in RFC 7997

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sat, 21 January 2017 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5AA129407 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:49:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=3.599, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DPnecwqy8Lkq for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:49:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9BC31293F3 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:49:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07FEB8034F; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:49:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E56CB808D5; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 09:13:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGW69ZYfcitU; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 09:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47827B808D4; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 09:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id r126so77867980wmr.0; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 09:13:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=LDxRnRNi4LOB94/wNTJmyUxdlQf5Wyo/EZHeY9X7maI=; b=eSuqyzxq7LveU02fNXQR05wHb5N+vaIZygYTOOTHhIgYAouBWwYYuLj9Zxwz4GKzJk Rt/4Iywq6Iyolx/qXN+dFf/L9bI/125xVxJAQPWFlz+0+sPcmI58cqqglRdx9v3BT84b M+6HOXOVXzA3klrBQRmVy8ExlyfgMI/pUNt6JyYsDA25A+CCz+WkI0ZpiAPpQOMIJewP a5Wp4Hq+wMa6AE/w/7QVE3x5oH10hN99M8g8dl8zZ3Oy70107M+aYDxfgjdJzb6ZCTQn aczfhM9AQbnkS9aM3sRoZ+mllm7n6wxL+KHisnnGj4eQ17lQ1MtJkRFdZleJ+oDjGV75 OVkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=LDxRnRNi4LOB94/wNTJmyUxdlQf5Wyo/EZHeY9X7maI=; b=RGKO7KamRIvJpzzgNW8eGo3rNhp8OkQrUsaZZLss6RgyibRA+HBT+Geo1bmABAQqQG M5I4ZBYZhEWN/3TqzbOQo7ahMW5PFk+r1SSWscImqk9fc3CBED7cag9Pnlf2rnxq+GGA wDAD3olCnzopHlGaprYPPrtPUTNgHlEzZea4QhEfcASFJoImGXAPTimkrUaVZ1obd6nf HtILyUl72uAPyqRfmfoQqhpC1nnQVVOI9MfxlYyIpbunUMumSd/dhMkQbDBEIRmo+8xt iN3bk7pIa/9XeHVHkHd5gHleB4dZT++cr6fYliDEPGmcVBUanwaSZXhenweR7DJJQ/D5 e+DA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKDE1t5ebe/FOL9aPDbqKM4pSxoIMrGjl7skh667rRxLV2pDnl38b4ClBgClmDTvw==
X-Received: by 10.28.212.82 with SMTP id l79mr7333992wmg.101.1485018806582; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 09:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from RoniPC (bzq-79-179-3-94.red.bezeqint.net. [79.179.3.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z67sm5316465wrb.49.2017.01.21.09.13.24 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 21 Jan 2017 09:13:25 -0800 (PST)
From: "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <480c6dfe-b590-abfa-0103-ac90641cd0f9@gmx.de> <00ed01d27369$0f8e9ad0$2eabd070$@gmail.com> <04696cbe-365d-572b-74c8-32145733e439@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <04696cbe-365d-572b-74c8-32145733e439@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:13:17 +0200
Message-ID: <013901d27409$a9124440$fb36ccc0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHzMtF/Ro0vYwpe+cSGWplQOD1IYgFQAP6EASJTJGCg7hr0MA==
Content-Language: he
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:49:07 -0800
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Hebrew contact information example in RFC 7997
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: 'RSE' <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi Julian,
This looks OK
Roni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 9:55 AM
> To: Roni Even; rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> Cc: 'RSE'
> Subject: Re: Hebrew contact information example in RFC 7997
> 
> On 2017-01-20 23:03, Roni Even wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The PDF version - section 3.2 is OK
> > As for 3.9 the alignment is not perfect.  The first problem is that
> > Hebrew is written left to right so typically we align to the left.
> > This will probably look weird in an RFC so I would expect alignment to
> > the right at least. As for the text itself it is OK in the pdf (not
> > the one in the email) As for the HTML version - the alignment is
> > better but still the first line with my name is not aligned This is
> > how it would look aligned to the left
> >
> >
> > רוני אבן
> > וואווי
> > דוד המלך 14
> > תל אביב 64953
> > ישראל
> > Roni
> 
> Like <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7997.html#n-address-
> information>?
> 
> Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest