Re: [rfc-i] Handling of large code sections ...

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Thu, 26 May 2022 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849F4C18514C for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2022 07:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653574745; bh=cARiNFjGPoqOlF2eEvtM1FwhPe6NHyqArazqN2PF1MA=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=MekgYsafEQbqHb/heUe34As0bVeSUYJPwP8I5EWdsIR+O+DT1PPw28awZqrfp3Gzd EfmwuWN8RTW9BcYibXYlvGuu0hs1SrN6Za64u0+OjlT+5nQ2uLZ+tpxUjmrQWhsudq MpQKF8hDU7N19mqKaMKBg0Oo1H7X68IlrIQTrwC4=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu May 26 07:19:05 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEBFC1850E2; Thu, 26 May 2022 07:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653574745; bh=cARiNFjGPoqOlF2eEvtM1FwhPe6NHyqArazqN2PF1MA=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=MekgYsafEQbqHb/heUe34As0bVeSUYJPwP8I5EWdsIR+O+DT1PPw28awZqrfp3Gzd EfmwuWN8RTW9BcYibXYlvGuu0hs1SrN6Za64u0+OjlT+5nQ2uLZ+tpxUjmrQWhsudq MpQKF8hDU7N19mqKaMKBg0Oo1H7X68IlrIQTrwC4=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279E9C1850E2 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2022 07:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.857
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.857 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alum.mit.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kdi6N-ghDoL9 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2022 07:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam10on20611.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:7e88::611]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F64C165513 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 May 2022 07:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NZnSsGzzzdhEnUyfzjnOvmcV6/2NjS9xmtZ0ZiY0V4RmFvY5LwRBkaPWjWEgLMr/nhuLQYAUr2YcauFTiCZkivd0izAIP+u0l+mGg8exNI5+lPZtMgZ2S5P8q9reyPG6Rw6arZQa3W2ygDpyvln6d2vMYDbmsWO+G9SPNyY+FNb26yY5Voh2PCFRf9u7swx165MsaooBGAckRFiFm3rdS1zIFlU4Dqmd614UmjnvoxwUgk1mw9WXtSzx3HIFZP3qHuYSLJqNucgsNnbe5svZfb2crG2ZdD6M9I7K4qRa7RzeJopUW6RtCyxScvCRq01VxuC4Gvrkj0b/NxRXqm/xsQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=Rk99zg+NAH9AL8wWdShiLm/F4oLpw18t9x6zSbnfZvc=; b=EqiL+YleULabpDmOY9zHNIiWEssI8//7TYJcUNpQ50q8OmDitsChOC/eA3E0kvokG+sr7JKAJPpMW49Zeot4f3PZQq1+S9ZiRGfGucm8f0NYM/PmMLOiA7EdeXdPLa/dCSwC18urHTJOKbmEljmrz7tlRxFIbLGm3Yv2W1WXU5LY+A6uplwxsK90F2I/J5l6+uRXStc1hhqZQD7I+bp5rlYGGljDJUp9NJ1n4jex3Hdk9r0Ef/26azJCKGzYaRpd5ROWi9/4niIAHeh6celkgz3umM6Z2/dqntxdr6ZVe77c/PwSlMVJvEbYlDCqUCv7aXF15f+pm0dBVh50xj1CZA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 18.7.68.33) smtp.rcpttodomain=rfc-editor.org smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alum.mit.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Rk99zg+NAH9AL8wWdShiLm/F4oLpw18t9x6zSbnfZvc=; b=A/6WVdjngYQ+awkdYYGCABgSh36474bLo6b8DFiWReEp6UVZ8Ss/L1PevijzI3OBXDGQkjulZs45Pm7JLmHxGsmjFjWrXryRUn481PBlsMY/2Rw7/8SBo7YnGvZJORpkbPT5CnmrX1V1FPdSQrI0Lyc6qRJNieTbH+sCRH3dIyQ=
Received: from SN7PR04CA0223.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:127::18) by MN2PR12MB4320.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:15f::7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5293.13; Thu, 26 May 2022 14:18:57 +0000
Received: from SN1NAM02FT0033.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:127:cafe::d4) by SN7PR04CA0223.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:806:127::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5293.13 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 May 2022 14:18:57 +0000
X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 18.7.68.33) smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of alum.mit.edu designates 18.7.68.33 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=18.7.68.33; helo=outgoing-alum.mit.edu; pr=C
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (18.7.68.33) by SN1NAM02FT0033.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.97.5.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5293.13 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 May 2022 14:18:56 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.52] (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 24QEIsc9032527 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 May 2022 10:18:55 -0400
Message-ID: <353d3d5e-9908-02e4-e32a-738982911f04@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 10:18:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20220526011112.3672D41A7547@ary.qy>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20220526011112.3672D41A7547@ary.qy>
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 001df30e-d98c-4dc2-e730-08da3f22abb3
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR12MB4320:EE_
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <MN2PR12MB43201FD189CFD11C80D06052F9D99@MN2PR12MB4320.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:18.7.68.33; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; PTR:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(40470700004)(46966006)(36840700001)(31696002)(4744005)(36860700001)(40460700003)(26005)(70586007)(70206006)(8676002)(508600001)(86362001)(356005)(5660300002)(75432002)(2906002)(7596003)(316002)(786003)(8936002)(31686004)(2616005)(336012)(47076005)(82310400005)(53546011)(6916009)(186003)(956004)(83380400001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-OriginatorOrg: alum.mit.edu
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 May 2022 14:18:56.6759 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 001df30e-d98c-4dc2-e730-08da3f22abb3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f; Ip=[18.7.68.33]; Helo=[outgoing-alum.mit.edu]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SN1NAM02FT0033.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR12MB4320
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/byT6I_pZDGNBFEECh-zzVGyudec>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Handling of large code sections ...
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 5/25/22 9:11 PM, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Paul Duffy (paduffy) <paduffy@cisco.com> said:
>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>> Folks
>>
>> Is it acceptable for a draft to externally reference large sections of code (say, parked in Github) versus
>> inlining into the draft?  The latter makes for easy access and input into the code's respective tool chain,
>> versus messy cut/paste of the former.
> 
> Maybe.  We do allow <xi:include href=blah> to import external files, but there's no way to refer
> to part of an external file.

IIUC this would be inlined when the document is converted to an RFC. So 
it isn't a permanent solution.

	Thanks,
	Paul

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest