IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] t with indent

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 29 December 2020 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF7F3A0C53; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 15:29:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b=LmET1OJk; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Oy/omlmM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2OiR6NyQ0UF; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 15:29:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E8F33A0C52; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 15:29:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D570F406D1; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 15:28:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FB3F406D1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 15:28:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=LmET1OJk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Oy/omlmM
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lkGcjNUDD6wg for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 15:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2870F406C6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 15:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3B4764; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:29:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:29:13 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=P 7hjoBZ6SJSqCkAk1L4h2CXNWgorUsAmWNpevLA6GD0=; b=LmET1OJky2bzfPHBf 94IQxqz3asijMZxSpIf+6BWvTwjT3ZD/bXwKGx5jWv4zU4/+J4jnNJgeQPI+4N8a 5x4BHPvXJM+8Er1G+T04twEnOjJmEjXNiN3RqDcHQi+AISkR8vvDhXZvQFWF/Niv lx738UJZohoFhvuoD+eh0RC7ZZIrHt6Hp8c4cxPYlSNp4IFLve9T2QHSt1W0+epw NkL/xL070Kgy4nHNCgxivjV7gyCBCiMURVChEmibIOTC1+JddgbglmGrJnHAI9to GYnl0RcX6x4RTEYj762Mu25MfbsrVrNIjAFb3flYEiC5adNJp2vWI4li/sVXktZU wHvow==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=P7hjoBZ6SJSqCkAk1L4h2CXNWgorUsAmWNpevLA6G D0=; b=Oy/omlmMUT9M+hCG00d81ChmdUdd0OdmvcuXcAiUbvAphgiCHeQ1Iaox8 MJybMOGqcaiXNHvWBZahEIUhGOeNxYbhlWladcRH/WdnnrRylT51MSDzPDPsnyTq TysU18R6Ghm7I68HTC3bAnU/XcsSXJ85CiImYqYyVJHHpa46/Phr4kPhlvrnNRDD +L4jlwFgMMmmNZL4m9AF8JCvThNhSekd6BlmJsrx1a0M25FXVcLSQu66rG+C4IC9 BfDCoUhsdewZVE2VNX1P0AdmWfQ7WOfNX0LXEOtzmg6fBZpktOJdbMDyTReqHVmF Pd+9LZ6jUoFs2WWCuUs7uKbcoH5pg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:xrvrX9sPqbNV8OnnZF1gyCI0RbsR2mhQeYWbSk0vBv6rGLXTKTdVrg> <xme:xrvrX2eeFDMSiJLrOzcQoyUwL23R7xXEj112cV-I68weBFNpUNSqf-ZvXVfv8AMOj k8sA22tnKAkkrRz6w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvddvvddgudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeevffffhfduteevvefhueffieegtdeutdehffeltefffedttdeggeejheeiueet teenucffohhmrghinhepmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppeduudelrddujedrudehkedrvd ehudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehm nhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:xrvrXwxUbJaF5FA-IeatogorbCgQ2P9ORU5eIFmt3WVNXQvlzUenvQ> <xmx:xrvrX0P9lYfNW3Szz1X7IOWsG6sKa3k0sDFr6QZ-5FPz1kzsMFzMeA> <xmx:xrvrX9_LbkzZwKesezoL0VWzInB26pQ_u8rttu5A83x9Hbp5dBCFgA> <xmx:ybvrX4aNkqx0y6Nxl1gM8aSxGpn9CxYdNSWzW63Yr1ooOvO0lVYSgA>
Received: from [192.168.7.30] (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 92D82240057; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:29:09 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.20.0.2.21\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <a7c58fc2-d342-12b6-8894-01599faef@taugh.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:29:07 +1100
Message-Id: <BF2714B9-A1A9-4621-8F4D-CD47552CCB1E@mnot.net>
References: <CABcZeBOvxuD0pnWrkcywcKBMsd4CuCrLB4YkmDStpwh7e-SkSA@mail.gmail.com> <20201229204714.0FB903511F3C@ary.qy> <CABcZeBOQZBaiJ3vfSOL79bv60g1vR8+LCNNsYVg001EXPu+TSg@mail.gmail.com> <a7c58fc2-d342-12b6-8894-01599faef@taugh.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.20.0.2.21)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] t with indent
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


> On 30 Dec 2020, at 8:35 am, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> In retrospect, we should have flipped it around and said that the XML default values aren't going to change.  There's a lot of stuff in RFCs 7991 to 7998 that has turned out to be a poor match for practice.

+1 - this is a very strange approach.

I note that 7998 says:

> The details (particularly any vocabularies) described in this
>    document are expected to change based on experience gained in
>    implementing the new publication toolsets.  Revised documents will be
>    published capturing those changes as the toolsets are completed.



--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email