IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [xml2rfc] use of sourcecode type

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Thu, 23 July 2020 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E30B3A0B5D; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=Ji+dlBK/; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=CgIXXsgE
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OhRuKtMtMpTk; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D72B3A0B5B; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C059F40755; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1635F40755 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=Ji+dlBK/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=CgIXXsgE
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IYFr9r-jqmxC for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A50A0F4074D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7021B5C00D1; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:23:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:23:48 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=E4PydIsuyfnGurKHMWE9W1I0DCAArMr T/8H2BL+E7P0=; b=Ji+dlBK/CQl/aPUEgqPujtAI3wZeOd1LVXDwYOK3hoest/3 RHcCCRpSxVZuHngfCtLyZOHzSeM91NCKI9cjeG4r0G0razN0tpZgAuiqsWk+TU14 9QGJnfrAkxJgZtAcbVh4ympJuNykgHLSCxONnuppSPTrOKhf7lum6bG06USnDs7y 2WtJ4i38pYQ08k7sR2IJtYpp3qUDESG1Q5tnTW85ThexdChXHYOSIZLHx1EuLTsC l90KhZRK+F69FutqcvNghN4/qnNSm+5LlSikEbq94SP9lgXKbEkMtAhdm02AERmQ /Zma9n5DShJcZGzTnr7b1h2Jczwx9PJgiRuZSvw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=E4PydI suyfnGurKHMWE9W1I0DCAArMrT/8H2BL+E7P0=; b=CgIXXsgErMZ30A9f4oh8zb WxC1mXN+oe33rUpAuvYJxZv93Qr2Eo7ztdYS5VFZqonCVn+A2RVtjtIosXBhJhxv u16RPFAjuhkeWfvnSD1OKjndErsEWZvDVJU0ccraU12k5DZgvrvrwxSAsfp3bbzt w3NB49ELK1YvJSg508Z22auH7BjwWn36QXF4dc3FiEIga1GcbNqpPLhqpF1bsp9Y tUAzWzAvponntfzo2TKKAuSfweml9KscCrQOi1JmQZZSwoFsr5rFj9vjcGvL/rj6 sm9qbGqiUUPT0gwMtZCXFIr/kZdWr3vDtz8dyLskNPtnOArfAiHe5TqH1ib33/Mg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:xAIZX40SynIYtCSChlB2k6mhhmwRrjG8jXGPPjLAObo-4f6hQGoc7Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrhedtgdejfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhht ihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeekteeuieektdekleefkeevhfekffevvdevgfekgfeluefgvdejjeeg ffeigedtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:xAIZXzGwphQp7ZJZhesXG4pDGSPEWvMsmjfL5rD6VjsW0rEf_bSyBg> <xmx:xAIZXw5j0W8oD8EKIRCciP_ClcP14IDnnoo-0kmYEalvYdQp0dMBEQ> <xmx:xAIZXx0t8XRKn6vB9zjXNjsBe4XcrpbUqU0lG-LRvH4SHn0dEZPU-g> <xmx:xAIZX_RhQxtGFbshHsD7ixB0r7RuIkABsBSNR635og4mHRA6UzOQuA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 08887E00A8; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:23:48 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-92-g11c785d-fm-20200721.004-g11c785d5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <8ea0ca88-15da-4d86-b199-0d99dc7675fe@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200723024552.38FAE1D65AD2@ary.qy>
References: <20200723024552.38FAE1D65AD2@ary.qy>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 13:23:26 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [xml2rfc] use of sourcecode type
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020, at 12:45, John Levine wrote:
> Once again, no.  The RSE keeps a list of conventional artwork types, 
> not IANA.  See RFC 7991, sec 2.5.7.

We documented this format in an RFC because we thought that interoperability matters.  I don't think that the RSE gets to be above that.
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email