Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Fri, 02 December 2016 10:58 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AD9129BEA for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 02:58:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=itaoyama.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVZoXBdM0MHs for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 02:58:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8C3F129BE4 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 02:58:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE8AB800CB; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 02:58:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9506FB800CB; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 02:58:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=itaoyama.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o4YGxcqRhUTn; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 02:58:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from JPN01-OS2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-os2jpn01on0127.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.92.127]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7B5B800CA; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 02:58:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=itaoyama.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-it-aoyama-ac-jp; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=lrpzhlWLlHymj+Sz8U5K9i+lfzVcLWp3BDYXZqWx8qA=; b=c1rnw8hV4ahuioPpqU/bRh3ZHhTzJhj/FKzhlc9t49p0JKG988BIJhfKX4PFK/sjqeg28LHAKGmzTP4YXyanO7NgmxI+OyKcHI5Hs59Zd7I88B3HwXDIjJ5ZyegCQBaQt3byvebnc4zFJnRsro+yHcviVnvRe50ilY/GF6YFZqo=
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp;
Received: from [133.2.210.64] (133.2.210.64) by TY1PR0101MB0988.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (10.167.157.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.747.13; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:58:13 +0000
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
From: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
Message-ID: <f540477c-08f1-944c-be13-38a31086cf4b@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 19:58:09 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
X-Originating-IP: [133.2.210.64]
X-ClientProxiedBy: KAWPR01CA0079.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (10.174.230.15) To TY1PR0101MB0988.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (10.167.157.151)
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 36bc9ece-9c09-4e5a-fa28-08d41aa21ccd
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:TY1PR0101MB0988;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; TY1PR0101MB0988; 3:8f0vFLupiadBZrqi0TPg6ubpS7QaUQ4eshZQSPE4FzPCxwZj3izt3sBEqLfZLyQIzc1/OJBeWel/ei9bp8I4MVZLDNauuRLbl2g/6mwQ4AaljJlShqNIuzGfm+SITNegu9KfKyKdS900JlkHia9BWRXmHSgHVe5AC7EJDvzULD8tBEczq7aJ+7Z4sZQiXomvN7+Whpw18O8srlmYlrU4ZmjiPAkFTfSH1rcPGeEug3WMx+FiBvi2SZEiIp5g3u/yzvdICbQG/l4dUdre+fhLHQ==
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; TY1PR0101MB0988; 25: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
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; TY1PR0101MB0988; 31:gXR09s7I47VWboiOfR3wK+W8MJauNG/nftrCGuoE385pwGns3x2Sgq2ZTK6Xu3/aw1ZUxIrElWbnmlqnNysY18/t2RA+EyAa4J/E1Uj4HOMZ4gY0lML76Um/8YaDG/Y3XQvgbrUDVTnMvMIOMRIXfpIPfsQqnJCmSSTZh38ZoPIn2ta+NiE6KvJP0iL5HGUpmvHziIjFYARZMYLmPpukN98ce5OyA8wwH4hR+K7I1nuaG1kAtxNe9QUXk8ROjxbEMuy6ZsXbNcNT6wT865/uyKoNVWwFmYHMeXDg1caC+F4=
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <TY1PR0101MB0988BB1558CD81A7556C912CCA8E0@TY1PR0101MB0988.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:(166708455590820);
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041248)(20161123564025)(2016111802025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6042181)(6072148)(6043046); SRVR:TY1PR0101MB0988; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:TY1PR0101MB0988;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; TY1PR0101MB0988; 4: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
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0144B30E41
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4630300001)(6049001)(6009001)(7916002)(24454002)(189002)(15374003)(53754006)(199003)(6116002)(31686004)(7736002)(50466002)(305945005)(92566002)(6486002)(65956001)(65806001)(74482002)(107886002)(105586002)(5660300001)(38730400001)(106356001)(76176999)(50986999)(733004)(450100001)(66066001)(65826007)(86362001)(42186005)(54356999)(81166006)(83506001)(23676002)(81156014)(7846002)(5001770100001)(31696002)(47776003)(229853002)(42882006)(6666003)(33646002)(64126003)(101416001)(2870700001)(90366009)(8676002)(4001350100001)(2950100002)(68736007)(2906002)(189998001)(3846002)(97736004)(3940600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:TY1PR0101MB0988; H:[133.2.210.64]; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: it.aoyama.ac.jp does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;TY1PR0101MB0988;23: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
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; TY1PR0101MB0988; 6:yG3TXtz+zna+x5P4MyAC/MfQvaM0bXQo+YBn8XPSsrA9ZvHGdAU3AXOt0niL7JkBjbrZyzSycEkgQOATCoYM3y7sYEaWpLSeHfwouCl1Tc9cJXfdp4UY0+XMbXuxlVSFqSkrKPuaugXF/4FphriFIOoFaxhaX2FaNsoWyaD2YkbptjgpHT8ElKtbbXhOCXkTdZ0RX1+8K63jk0bdm+iiVQL2nhM3ZSrzZ0+hBCSnDBhrZQyhcELDQMjJ3KBJ5gXrGMCfsY7HiP66hOpe1uiRSLhoCtQIO46TF1ifJIyK9jp/D0FNq+s5G7gWgV4Grv8O1+QRdXaJXL/RtzEFoxVO13Qv8x9eLW5xdcu/zRC15lVE/kSK+AwEQqWwdDJVzRUqjTDY94sKB9+NgFAqY2ueYq2XTvm3UIxHTTdKPCpLtB8UcMdSJuHAgiS4oj6EkX4zWh5au2pp5j8p/nTXbVwW5zJJ/3Ticg0a0eXoIWN1JhM=; 5:ZU4R/NPZfi4n90fWQsTKSNcNHgOf3w3kc+HQy/PVJltgyidpfSxLIkRoEbo/Z7gbGPgKTFgrOCdt+bXzKoZoBaXjMNZ0+KG5OB7oP+R/1aeX4Xz86cZT7Io07i0qj8gtzCeIpnETBcBD519IrEc5OA==; 24:7J0MAMbPqu12Dljrt8xwKmUalAHkhxJPsnrDaoTjvSb9rUlmv8M65kl7fe8fRJ4MtHtYPPZQKrLjMP19ENyQUdnLskjrTBBtm5tcWT6V1ZA=
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; TY1PR0101MB0988; 7:tZ4JFnLBmYwEisCW6ghHieXQtIzCzdsyMCydS5mwLsdGBfWemKrOXa9P9qmdPZcpA47ynCutDGTkb8t7CPsNozdUcU5ReEaHDLnLApYKBFwFF5PCwTUFQGPP4TvzgVR+DXkt84mnspgkiwp54Yrd7EBBCALGj9RwWa+bDo7UdqYMwVxgavETGpBsz1yXDAc3JySU5WAxgI3ZmbxMzTeaF8a7XypuXcb/pVq7RhF4vWQDJzdG0ADNQZ02uLn8TeLToAa/rJ+J+2S4TrBw0GEknGtPbOw9eMl/4XhcAL/tRwlM5+ChW0DBzdA2H4dPccMlOzFoDvUsmCUQhe7y81Xz5XpaZSFh/GS52uUIOn4ymjJPRTmxidUmLTS+Tk1yWB9gEx9IxZGNu8M1AU/5Bj0GPbv0Ngiy9CHce5JAzLsdy0hJOD8e8ID9z0BvaM7HVrG5TO15SpoQit1XUaxcYQ7S5w==
X-OriginatorOrg: it.aoyama.ac.jp
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2016 10:58:13.5787 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: TY1PR0101MB0988
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Hello Heather, others, On 2016/12/02 04:21, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote: > > Hello all, > > A first draft of the CSS that will be embedded in the new HTML output > format is ready for feedback. Great start. See more comments below. > The developer and I do not consider this > done. In particular, things that need work include: > > * Mobile layouts will need further polish. > * The index is not aligned with the other sections. > * Compact lists have been given only a preliminary treatment. (And lists > in general could use a bit more attention.) > * Notes have not been given any treatment > * Certain classes have not been accounted for (e.g. ".finalized"). > > Given the restrictions around JavaScript, features like hamburger menus > (those three or four lines that appear when the display is too small to > show something like a table of contents or sidebar) are not available. > > Sample document: > https://rfc-format.github.io/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/sample.html > > If you have suggestions or recommendations, please add them as an issue > in github. > > Issue tracker: > https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues Here are copies of my github issues for those who prefer the mailing list: #10: Indentation from left edge needs more work Currently, there are (too!!!) many different amounts of indentation from the left edge of the page. That "Index" is less indented than anything else seems to be a clear error. But the bigger problem is that block text is indented more than headings. This may be a direct influence from the text format, but it looks really out of place in the new format where headings stand out clearly because of their larger size and heavier weight. I have just at random checked a wide variety of books in my bookshelves, and none of them indents text blocks more than headings. #11: Duplication of alternate address info in header unnecessary for Latin script This may not be a CSS issue; if not, please reroute. I have tried to explain this many times, and I was under the expression that I was successful, but apparently not: "ɟ. H̭ildebrand (J. Hildebrand)" and "Čisco Śystems, Inc. (Cisco Systems, Inc.)" in the header look totally silly, not because they are constructed examples, but because they are useless overkill, different from any other serious publisher going back centuries. Please fix. #12: References use e.g. "BCP47, RFC5646", should be "BCP 47, RFC 5646" This may not be a CSS issue; if not, please reroute. In the reference section, there are missing spaces. Example: [LANG-TAGS] Phillips, A. and M. Davis, "Tags for Identifying Languages", BCP47, RFC5646, September 2009, http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5646. It's clear that there should be no spaces in the URI (and the doi, which is missing in this case), but otherwise, there should be spaces after "BCP", "RFC", and so on, as there are spaces in the current RFC format in these places (see e.g. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6497.txt). In addition, I think there's a translation error, in that the "author" field of [GOST3410], "Государственный стандарт Российской Федерации", would translate into something like "Official Standard of the Russian Federation", but the equivalent field reads "Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology", which according to Wikipedia would be "Федеральное агентство по техническому регулированию и метрологии". > If you have time and interest, you can be of even more assistance by > creating additional sample files according to the HTML spec so that the > CSS developer has more content to test against. I'd like to start converting a bis version of RFC 6068 to the new format, including some really internationalized examples. Any pointers to how to do that? (I'd want to generate the HTML from XML.) > Thanks for your time and attention! > Heather Flanagan, RSE Thank you (and everybody else involved) for your hard work! Regards, Martin. _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Dan York
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Russ Housley
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Yoav Nir
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Joe Hildebrand
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Russ Housley
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… Larry Masinter
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Julian Reschke