IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rfc-i] Epub format tools

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Tue, 22 November 2016 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B67012966C for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:10:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7kqjIfqv2fmf for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:10:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5763612964E for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:10:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D52AB81700; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:10:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934ABB81700 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:10:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uTKy9cwurag6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:10:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66AD4B816FE for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:10:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id t79so30095453wmt.0 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:10:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rEVzANAHXdBX8EDvZIbxZ+Na5bHQic8wSQkK2H0TxEk=; b=D0ZTvak0q7ICNA2s/Z0C8qP9yf6TCXFSYqjbrUfRWeWeb5+F8heE/meTy8FaTWxWZL c8WNnqDbpsmQx1rk2xomNjypKTCJqCb43FWfuDPbeQ/hoGceVGQWUWmQhm9lgGHIzO68 u0OWO9qHwesZdE53pHwNeh4CPLUXnl0cWrMK4sLc+++hd+E0VMrbBGzCuwPL219glxuG 0tIqOtxOxIxsTNQToaGgZ9kdQBbVT3g00K5+puwqYaiJp3dsAvVc0fWRmq/Llzvi1g88 l/BccKzss8lRdSkb8VZwTpngX1gb9ZNVtE+sp72uXlPd5gQZHt1ddCtWbO1fcH9YY92C Ks/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=rEVzANAHXdBX8EDvZIbxZ+Na5bHQic8wSQkK2H0TxEk=; b=K23V4Qm+/2zOM7Z7n/CryjT7JdQ/NqNLdcwZLWet0azwTFgAoMVBVzSR6oszjpoW2v LtUX32o3uj6BqkKG3mEpIC5QploFPE9dalsAqsx36sT+cca+VBq1u2a/nv3/evrl18sS xd8M63nGOlH50npraF+qXtXDw2sODzqEzVDWe7qzWdEP+JFas+VUftRaCP38ufeh8Vjz I0xGd4TDJxfrVV8DqVRXltwBMCSg+soqxUij2wqtvDO93432qR0RMOleYc1GEkj5Gu6u u9L3snQ5RVUPbj6ClBcDqlm4jSRWWSPnDElj4OEqg6gaKh1FjII3s/qRXDvleDrNMXRk XJeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02WeZYsLgbrIgD13c+2zpPlDKoxPk16LEFFd/ZpTJzpMZkrIY7Sw4EecSePldDbRJWtYU2YPMP866ObfQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.165.131 with SMTP id o125mr2906081wme.9.1479827419826; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:10:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.3.41 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:10:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:10:19 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: U4NZQ8fPdQCceOgHLffwW0QEzNQ
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwiPYuvnYkGmxt51-osVwGzak6SVvsNrfNOUXMO8LFQ4dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [rfc-i] Epub format tools
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6734473935954501802=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

The W3C has just absorbed the ebook publishing standards forum.

Since what they are doing is maintaining a subset of HTML and a packaging
format, wouldn't that be an appropriate basis for the upload format?

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email