Re: [rfc-i] some thoughts about errata

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 08 February 2017 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB749128E18 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 02:22:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id anXJSWJ4R7l4 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 02:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABC8B1295B4 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 02:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5909BB819F4; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 02:22:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B03B819F2; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 02:22:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1SIQuMNBEk2R; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 02:22:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 441FCB819EC; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 02:22:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.197] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSMr9-1czEqH0TSl-00TXT1; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 11:22:10 +0100
To: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <53C0FEEE.9060903@gmx.de>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <49a49c57-14f5-0a38-698b-c6e1a9586bb5@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:22:11 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <53C0FEEE.9060903@gmx.de>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:UfUnsm1oqKkBYCSGGgmfthudfEyH9EBDZdPw4X7X5urOAO3GmB9 ntKKH82LcMIOByA2jSiDsDsSdcDZtod5m+04wOVpuwTjgT+FqX7GOHVdo8XrXDFUhLQwjC+ CSDWhjyOhJdMVqyUuineVcBZf+iX0sB/3+6F0z283t1zFgI62zPOMVoWTPAZNYKa7KnFkgW mg/3rlY4Bh2OyWWQe4TcA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:zrBDA45e4IY=:Sz4diJCDfCySQ6RTFp3/ic Wysn/eqV9NSAP9k8ggPn1MUt7VxoZ27M0bK9E+idNulp8VDppZ7L40DMjApK9oRE5VJHRKfY3 wapy+cKLeXiaLbPDyiMUvThPJ8b/eKy9ig2S/tIoQtuMa6OKf8fq7HzMrSC1fpOr+2bLh1kiK fHyG0VBtU4lRcTQcqoqlIE5344fVm+iLquzEHhuq+ir4zQv112mCkh2sAERXkzZuBwv85JJSu 3z2BooJnmaB6sBNrQPSlixraFfxwD+mD0RmT6Wb7W60i6Yvc+BGE+IuyzU+zH30gFOnDnWHk+ NRfuoPMVV+F9VZa9uM3hqRCHukJv3qHaHcm7tgnx5AKkX0KF1cJn9bz00DK2ELAazwEr9jm7K Yo5EcldYi5jTM80TQkEXrMFpf+Qjj35GI8PcBZ66GEIeQuE7yimUK/3+PDlQhsPbuK/8oqgpm tvUdSVAIbb4s80fphXOvjLmi+jXdDOdQvDP2UJOc62R99wxNCjcWFw74rDCpDqc42qUmCAihr zH3E5/y2D61HDyRmw7hMR8qvZg/RkUxUGqR+6jcVZv/GMWCOOOJWKy9rDTJaEixLv/ENxdYE8 ezrHCP2mNyGGKTKAK/zpstiEqbdBWPGWv79e2Gtks6q4ml0pcq+UPOMNp1GI4xCAwDRSVMJCk jlkmwcoVjCya4H8+2aJP5PFupFkH0fUrAAbivN05+Nfq0zvO0yQo9ORkB0hwm2SdOxWlWg6+A VBvQ23/XO7fk9/IuELnq2Rr1iW7y96M3XEenLyvQehI4CRDn+2ajKYKWB5gbKOp/taIfzgoSn 3OpB9Vmr4xDU3+YGdU5LMdnjXCFPRc6nhEeGq3TivmYeFUQwPbBZlyMynnSu4jd35X9fX7z6P uvQ1HB65P7NU/qImijm2NAX5VPdP4Jbl2sF6jAAPeJHAJrVl+EyJi0Zz/Fee1QCtUy1SwDB3n XFZ/vmH3WoEeBdRvpDQHpFxgyFBKN33eVyjkLEvaQ3pnytzE6yA4pb1mXh5nqqNHdx6Pa5NDI FP4K6/8g/cp9sLj8OQUrEckCthIPk4+ykuTVi1eH06NL0CARxHhcxcUoHOWlmxfF7A==
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] some thoughts about errata
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rse@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 2014-07-12 11:25, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Below are some thoughts about how the errata system could be made more
> useful; note that this isn't about the process but just about the
> information offered by the RFC Editor web site:
>
> 1) Each erratum should have a stable URI that can be used for citations.
>
> 2) For each RFC, there should be a machine-readable (*) HTTP resource
> (**) offering status information about the set of erratas present for
> that RFC. The minimal information about each erratum would be ID and/or
> URI, status, and the section number it applies to (when available).
> Extra points for date information and maybe a title.
>
> (*) Optimally both JSON and XML. The former is good for JS running in
> browsers, the latter fits better into document production toolchains
> starting with XML anyway.
>
> (**) That implies proper CORS settings so that browsers can actually get
> the information even when the origin of the document is different.
>
> Best regards, Julian

OK, this was 2.5 years ago. People apparently agreed (and asked for even 
more).

Heather, could you please provide some feedback?

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest