[rfc-i] ABNF Core Rule extensions

dhc at dcrocker.net (Dave Crocker) Fri, 30 January 2015 23:15 UTC

From: "dhc at dcrocker.net"
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:15:00 -0800
Subject: [rfc-i] ABNF Core Rule extensions
In-Reply-To: <20150130214124.GN3110@localhost>
References: <54C3CF7F.6090901@seantek.com> <54C4AFF1.6030608@gmx.de> <54C7FAD7.7040500@alum.mit.edu> <54C870B5.7000205@seantek.com> <20150128173229.GC3110@localhost> <54C9632A.2040204@seantek.com> <20150128230227.GG3110@localhost> <54CB6B9A.1080801@seantek.com> <54CBB82F.2050007@alum.mit.edu> <54CBEB88.4020608@dcrocker.net> <20150130214124.GN3110@localhost>
Message-ID: <54CC1074.3060306@dcrocker.net>

On 1/30/2015 1:41 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> That seems like overkill, unless there's pent up demand for lots of
> extensions (which there might be, but I wouldn't know).


This is the second serious effort within not very many months.[*]  And
folks have regularly suggested additions constantly for maybe 20 years.
 These are consistently reasonable suggestions, but that's not the same
as saying that the community feels need of the enhancement.

So I'd rather make it easy to define the addition and link it into the
base and then let the market decide whether it's worth using.


d/

[*] Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF
    https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7405

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net