IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 02 December 2016 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15AF12944C for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:39:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=UvBRXtIK; dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=bydUG9Ha
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YvjHh1PbyRnK for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1401129453 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:39:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88F1B817CB; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:39:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302D2B817CB for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:39:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=UvBRXtIK; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=bydUG9Ha
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GYHTo7Nrhs56 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03E56B817CA for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 58655 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2016 22:39:43 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=e51e.5841f82f.k1612; bh=6Lbm1tZoSG9q5FNBGoI9tfb5T+sjx7UHBWgNSozI4vg=; b=UvBRXtIKv+SQkAm7Fp4HWIiOznbekcagPDyCJvKzecjlNx3LhbvNEcdBY5pjvkYtG/u6McL2CuylWmoMCn/HVroIPmH5ihcw+8b25V4ShyeuxDmSBOK0alK7T3w8RN9Shxs5T5rrJRBKr7H6pOyHHgbfsD9ZizS5/Lt3LDwPPRauLgKv+bsof8K9Bq8zNjr3IHXWqfPb3m4XIVhZ0VMDpLEdAjj3/uG0s23pV4Bl1MD4vy9Gbss0VOibQlMS4Lua
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=e51e.5841f82f.k1612; bh=6Lbm1tZoSG9q5FNBGoI9tfb5T+sjx7UHBWgNSozI4vg=; b=bydUG9Ha/8DNHzrau/a0l0myUgKmH/2e3whhgDz+mV1i6PW3Xk25OeVitWzOuUDittxRuWJfjFoNqGSC6zkyKyJ5HwJqJ38UnbNgZsCVL44PCNlGFQo7b9PojFQWLvWItIwFgEeREBMfwhl1GCWWb7htpYnbYLazgcq0UcdGxSWA4KdHve2Mhbh1et6xXfOR192VRWhMRVtC6Db9Njpm2nlP540ASmDh329Np73zi3uXtUsUJd7ALnpiaOc3iswD
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 02 Dec 2016 22:39:42 -0000
Date: 2 Dec 2016 17:39:38 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612021739190.55231@ary.qy>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e46334f6-3e0b-809e-8a5f-1a3784ebf588@gmail.com>
References: <20161202221919.7465.qmail@ary.lan> <e46334f6-3e0b-809e-8a5f-1a3784ebf588@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

>> For that matter, I'd argue that since the XML is the canonical format,
>> the XML code markings clearly label the code and we're done.
>
> Yes, that *ought* to be the case, but I would much prefer to see the Trust legal
> provisions modified accordingly. It's going to be complicated enough persuading
> lawyers and judges that XML is more canonical than plain text, without also
> expecting them to re-interpret the Trust text as well.

I'm a trustee, I can bring it up.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email