IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Wed, 22 January 2020 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656D6F40712 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:09:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72pOpEV7b4p0 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:09:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1A1F40710 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:09:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96953897E; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:09:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC2FC69; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:09:48 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
In-Reply-To: <f351a1e5-6f5b-394d-5526-51e5b69d8ae2@huitema.net>
References: <CAMm+LwiXhhJO7qYi41+DC4W7uMUVipXqyq75Fq2vagA1ppJNdA@mail.gmail.com> <10cca93f-a8b8-4c42-0653-3b12fa67ad12@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgA-1UffBfrH-Y3J6pfh7ni9kNrndp=gHNyUyi5j=oLxg@mail.gmail.com> <53607da4-6608-783b-b875-65551e3add19@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgNU2Dr3bB+A8k+UwbQiRRzgUkoRRh60tc6+bBv6CXwfQ@mail.gmail.com> <70ed6362-41ee-faf5-8f90-d094455dbdf4@gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwhy-AV_K5evzGdpDi-ynpLE4RxXCVB1HercickYfZaubg@mail.gmail.com> <27103.1579626232@localhost> <31cf835c-aad6-637f-fc12-8f3efa04e6e7@gmail.com> <DC069039-92DF-4F03-89EC-6D42E5A61E3F@tzi.org> <f351a1e5-6f5b-394d-5526-51e5b69d8ae2@huitema.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <27382.1579712988.1@localhost>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:09:48 -0500
Message-ID: <27383.1579712988@localhost>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:09:42 -0000

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
    > Yes, but you are also careful to always keep the same vertical
    > arrangement of the lights so the result can be unambiguous even in grey
    > scale.

Quebec always has to be different:

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=quebec+traffic+lights&go=Search&qs=ds&form=QBILPG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email