IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 30 October 2020 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4108D3A0B71; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b=meg6fKGk; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=GJ1jd8M8
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tDHx9Y8XY3zq; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6960A3A0917; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3247DF40721; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71A5F40721 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=meg6fKGk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=GJ1jd8M8
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AhXMezgUIi6S for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64CF4F4071E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926725C007C; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 21:04:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 21:04:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=4 wHHD1JfzW3vP9340kan336DxoELn9ObFi0zx/V6h9Y=; b=meg6fKGkKFZYDoCgg Y70FEZJyjwjiusXBO9PzKz2aJs8+58Vi9g/cDSxdjKmW4lGZLzVolnRWC4ttrXN+ uBvLkqqDxIbRok5VJWvt0FyC7AIgRuzo5gvLdPj/ADHGBIKdWM4KGedz5Lus7T8o 3YUQFZRL07yH/WyDSf9rykE2fDRoZWGMNpHi384SiK2FaDM3T1c78xDLgPVdyP0L bGfExUKgyLT/1TivYstKqGDxj2DeaRD6jbkq2Rd5+tP7AfbF0qVjT2l5/lqrkLTQ 49Jf+M5ICbn1M97yNWAmQ4ey53S7tMeHFqYgYXqjIpHdydwCE6SgbJk74b7dHQ6q 3sSEQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=4wHHD1JfzW3vP9340kan336DxoELn9ObFi0zx/V6h 9Y=; b=GJ1jd8M8gaKaclax116pLmPyJcJs9pCtyv4WhRcNHqX9VmSj82BMnHMXR g/APDQa9+3ZcsOw6El2xjpgKu+Ll0lqc3pAe3RulAZroieSbklLfpfONHr2uLxuE OGmyipBm4vy6PFjY9wmBFfLY9ACT1bDBzA1cI4P+IggHeIg2IKgcwMZhGZWj//ox w+LZHo8Q7IhZlne3ajRj6vX8NNh9rVKsM23zotWj4Ix9psdurYno01jVHvHElfg8 o1I8MwqJHAOgYg2pT2uZ5PfvYTsz+7ZwCzTUModPiX+adexXvj/EpKxQqhO+c0an CeqWtIzGAU5Qg9FVdCtTBTLb/+7tg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:jWabX4hUvFW2KPCDi8SOUwz6i7j9q4iMeyS_wunwQyyI05bb7TUNuQ> <xme:jWabXxBKeNoY9SVHsV9NJiFLNynlRDleDs8cdnHiU76SHtcb4uY6R-neOi4pp0Olh Vlwc7xRCawfoEwmlg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrleeggddvlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnheptdfgveeiveevgfdtudehfeehvdfhuefhffdtieeiiedvheefffehteefleekkeet necuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppeduud elrddujedrudehkedrvdehudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:jWabXwFB4jV8xnYMBge_1fhzr27LhmlVJI1upIZ9e2PpJY9YBfi8XQ> <xmx:jWabX5T_i0cKzQNqSgwa_QdwHYjNxG9WuvmExg0WEbHQ6i-FqJB6PQ> <xmx:jWabX1yO7m70-bKf4RPjeOc6u0Zqvtbs6p4Ob7jctCVeUZ3pxWhJ2g> <xmx:j2abX9-4FzfyjMleC9OnJfSjF1NxAQerntC_fLLiiqgZ83ZXPKlNQw>
Received: from [192.168.7.30] (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5CC863064682; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 21:04:12 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <5D96590E-8F78-440E-9A86-0CDBD7CF2F63@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:04:09 +1100
Message-Id: <5F6F5C80-9C5D-439E-8C44-A720C8AE0D92@mnot.net>
References: <30D23CA0-2A80-4BA3-AC18-285CF45FB5FF@mnot.net> <13255.1604019169@localhost> <5D96590E-8F78-440E-9A86-0CDBD7CF2F63@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


> On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:58 am, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2020-10-30, at 01:52, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> I like once line per sentence though.
> 
> (Yep.  I learned this as “classical keyboarding”.  We discussed this over in https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629/issues/80 …)

*confused* My understanding of what you wrote there was that it was still wrapped:

> In particular if you can resist the temptation to reformat even sentences (unless the reach the margin of the TTY, in which case you just break that line).


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email