[rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>"
julian.reschke at greenbytes.de (Julian Reschke) Tue, 01 March 2016 18:19 UTC
From: julian.reschke at greenbytes.de (Julian Reschke)
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:19:19 +0100
Subject: [rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>"
In-Reply-To: <56D5DA89.3050305@nostrum.com>
References: <56D54BCA.9050805@gmx.de>
<C743E43B-43A1-408C-9037-4760A39D4CF5@att.com> <56D5A4DD.5000505@gmx.de>
<D9C48575-870C-4A3D-A552-824EE02DFCC3@att.com> <56D5DA89.3050305@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <56D5DD27.3040406@greenbytes.de>
On 2016-03-01 19:08, Robert Sparks wrote: > ... > I read Julian's suggestion to be <em class="bcp14"> > Julian is that what you meant? > ... Right (that's what rfc2629.xslt does). Of course if there's a requirement that these terms will *not* be visually different unless enabled by a specific user-provided CSS then using <em> makes it bit harder to achieve that (we'd need a CSS class that undoes whatever default CSS comes for <em>). Best regards, Julian
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" HANSEN, TONY L
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" HANSEN, TONY L
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" Robert Sparks
- [rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>" Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor