[rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc
pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu (Paul Kyzivat) Tue, 16 February 2016 21:35 UTC
From: pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu (Paul Kyzivat)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:35:36 -0500
Subject: [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc
In-Reply-To: <C85B2838-8433-4F79-8238-0BFD6D9D3DE8@att.com>
References: <C85B2838-8433-4F79-8238-0BFD6D9D3DE8@att.com>
Message-ID: <56C39628.1040101@alum.mit.edu>
On 2/16/16 2:28 PM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote: > Wherever there's a src= element, there should be an originalSrc element to match. The originalSrc element itself might be a reason to keep src=. Thanks, Paul K > Tony Hansen > > > > > On 2/16/16, 1:50 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of jhildebr at cisco.com> wrote: > >> <artwork> has an @originalSrc attribute to track where the source came from, after the @src attribute has been de-referenced and included (either as text inside the element or as a data: URI) by the preptool. >> >> Should <sourcecode> have the same thing? The @name attribute's semantics are different. > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list > rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest >
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc HANSEN, TONY L
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Paul Kyzivat
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] sourcecode/@originalSrc Paul Hoffman