Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML
Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Fri, 30 October 2020 01:39 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916643A00C9; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f4bFnz4ektgp; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED4F63A0ABA; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDD6F40723; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0D5F40723 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cKjsg_ewci3n for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1BAF40722 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id h21so5886073iob.10 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=yJM7LP+Br2yE7inrgVO3bDwMta3xkS6qUGKzU21QjqA=; b=rdzqBevRlctgo3OGyaxGJx7GSSvvT8KYMeCxyK6NGmIahbGqqbb+MVFtqvDiMD3wLB U5NsbMdFaV4+HmzrkdmEiNxJmmjNzXE+xGWcRTvtjH9O+gLYelW5Fmzf/7qI9xIk/PHA 0+w2LAK7MCvX1/qfGu6rfTjHmd59nenjbvAipfANcXXSqcpzcLzQ5V+p/noAqJ/LXXWN A7fl+zlIIQ/6J+XucGxSO/rXSDJFTopsFy2b9+gU545v1M4fUlh0mz4bgHIlByd0qMQT ePAV7sxADscXtwRMOXKQXA+0SjkE5Jd+Kk5HUruSWwtB7Un6mEmbUDekokxxKO2kvJJK Evyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=yJM7LP+Br2yE7inrgVO3bDwMta3xkS6qUGKzU21QjqA=; b=SukhQbNggiDLg3uCuuSgOJgfjArJMThlvg1eKlWTmYo+UogxXUidThv4FNsAK1Nw8g aZL/sA0CU/xSnZl/xAdD3oE9rvZHBTLtoGmyng2mPceQRtyAvZov9ZzguTuoYLl3g51z uCGZn8/N6635zik3lCb/nHSC1EoSd0Boufa9EN9h8fXZeW07yZCYQZenkHOs39V+Ku4u oZZHGCgjZyBwwb7Nbi/CQoQ5SAuL9Z+M2HYUVOOqQ8LgTXEhKgqIadSnLlQxpl+YM0MM JUMT4arLXSeL7tbSomzvhgGUjd9/QtapaVNuGe3YCM9S8QfMoUDGI8k4EFntvWAB3qgI 0uzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qaKafoYXK8NioBVeU/Ck9BsV/ZG7snhIAoJPhoqL2NvhB39TT bqkg8vWxyliRPh4PDnFxoASEImRlmHzEcOkhql4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxyhzPiLAIMwJLkWwDGI29FonDXi1d6cVjO79oHZiBnFXNiyZd2j/HnUqu779e33NTjgW6hQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cc3c:: with SMTP id o28mr133218jap.107.1604021963108; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.22] (pool-108-28-189-254.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [108.28.189.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i87sm4583240ill.25.2020.10.29.18.39.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <30D23CA0-2A80-4BA3-AC18-285CF45FB5FF@mnot.net> <7e447678-599c-3bdd-40ff-eacea9ab8f78@nthpermutation.com> <E2C4653A-6557-4E80-847C-B3E77A35BA7E@mnot.net> <ac2a7cfd-d51c-5803-21dc-4fefa5ecf235@nthpermutation.com> <470AFB98-0A95-4444-9897-8406304D86C5@mnot.net> <7C8466BD-70C9-4785-9DE6-A565428DDC1B@tzi.org> <BFB0AB98-84BC-4D61-9A64-737AE4B316C0@mnot.net>
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Message-ID: <3997e4a3-f836-85d3-e5ff-63564f3b728f@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 21:39:19 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BFB0AB98-84BC-4D61-9A64-737AE4B316C0@mnot.net>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
On 10/29/2020 9:25 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > On 30 Oct 2020, at 12:24 pm, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: >> On 2020-10-30, at 02:18, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >>> Thanks! Is it possible to control the wrap column? >> You can set fill-column, but I do get some weird results. >> Also note this snippet from the source: >> >> ;; TODO: >> ;; - insert newline between some start-tag and text. >> ;; - don't insert newline in front of some end-tags. >> >> Especially the last TODO is a bit jarring. > Yes, I'm seeing a lot of those, which is not great. > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > Like I said, I haven't tested any of this, but you can set the value of fill-column on the command line I think as --eval "(setq fill-column 72)", or on a per document basis by including a formatting comment on the first line (and assuming this is preserved by the RPC, probably the best way to get a consistent document): <!-- -*- mode: nXML; fill-column: 72 -*- --> or alternately at the end of the file: <!-- Local Variables: --> <!-- fill-column: 72 --> <!-- End: --> With respect to the TODO stuff - one possibility is to split off a copy of the source and modify it to meet IETF needs - obviously renaming the function. Later, Mike _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Salz, Rich
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Michael Richardson
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] line wrapping in XML Mark Nottingham