Re: [rfc-i] contacts section?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 26 February 2021 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B343A0E48; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:35:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qV6Mo3RQt3Qv; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:35:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2204F3A0E47; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:35:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3998FF40744; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:35:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A283F40744 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:35:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yzxvGU5E0ahf for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:35:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3A7FF40741 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:35:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1614332142; bh=1Nj5/ek4vtFoNf3VIHmbn2+9aYNaTXz2UIqx3K4iV5I=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=WfzOsOQCI/e3hWdyM22HExnuWCoYZr2U707KPc+KhnSf/mKfC/tny3TkFvn45NI3e 5gVOctkHFn2EH6a28D9E1beGKUNX3Dwq3eVJUCJtpW2VCeAwIiob8/tJiZ0Ot4/Li0 WYzzSkW4o2i3Rk4SCOY+2YTOadv9dCkod0rabhY0=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.50.34]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MNt0M-1lQWoP3ROq-00OCTZ for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:35:41 +0100
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20210226092712.GA7967@miek.nl>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <0bcd3cac-6fa4-b7e1-63ae-e81380bb07cf@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:35:41 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210226092712.GA7967@miek.nl>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:pC7EbzjntYMsO4qG9WHivDwpzxnXgVDFvFAW39olJGlhotlV9s8 lbpsPZomEh2qLmsM6rrveGnrguPvxp7KaRdoSkU1jtystXMtek8VVG0r3RtXSdFbbw7RuJV A60aqHzTBm6WJJLMbyKKas8qTwt1JM+h2qq1Yajo9EWOZEd7HjDZheQFLwO9dbP0/Yte5Q5 H/oQT6b9J9K3eT90VLDxA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:vQBYJ7eVq84=:hpIE7fzA0EML0MbaGkNi/s mv/iWlL075NxjW70PWb3a+I0m7GzRuvw+cArqg9nHfygJl8wSehR1kjR4HmfPhfSjUr2LjFso y0yGqgMBvMzOSSxqJeXPbZeKTwD5ietB3LGIJ5uAW3dVeXTftZ93Yq0wY072ZhLm4pxzQUrSH y2R4Ri8yWzFz400S+/MFgO2IPehOU7tDyXzyeyWQB/anA9YAhxpYDWHoi8wBgwkE16gPhvPTS sh/Qsjg3V0Si6i1hqLHRETGbjQKcbxeqPOsfD6bmVfaSw01qWNmWTrvyOage7ku5uxxpH7bQG VWlWrrU9Rh9Acd8zQLHcWXqaxS5y/XBSo4gzej6XnSIXga3eZLaJdup8lA9oZ4BX/Q9t4M7f/ v3zTa+x2tj1WWLN6El9ClC/CztGb03emXkhUsIUYXhnWcDmssnVjLLgyBbuwzppkQXoR54/Uj HHDTttaPooOCTUVnuPg5tu6X4EZnKPTtdW5L/LiDNvy2TyXgcQScuCvf4AQuTPCdrZcHJewtw Eu8fNsMHYEnt7oHBsuvxm3kf2aeJ5F07JmeIeGlQfEgysZp5OcPqOelU1q3I5BVtCBrq4p3S1 2k2Qx52B8ZXpY6UX5pkI2JCElJh7S0rer8B5Q23bn/U5dBwnvaqwCAWp49pF6OCQggQbbuKhg YxrNYGibGxh8A049vp6bxAq6gpXbsU+/x8FLU3Q9AfH+UTKhf55Q8B01KE6KydEHItynJdIge JQaxYXok3xOQ82xFKQ42CAocElelvqn9S9RmprrCH5R6WgyKYiZS5CYQxu47oJv8tMkHRPs4c 4C3Lfb7P2HZysCkM4nk950igLkoZNPhnD6tXAEsHUSsMagtT8mzvmy7amjn8A2Gue1gGt6nNY tfSHGIhjyrz6FBwOGYOA==
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] contacts section?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 26.02.2021 um 10:27 schrieb Miek Gieben:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently added support for contacts in mmark and this allowed to
> play with it some
> more. This showed it's very hard to discover that a person named as a
> contact is in fact a
> <contact>. The txt and html rendering just show the full name of the
> person as if I typed
> that directly.

That's what happens when you use <contact> inside a text flow. This was
added relatively recently to allow non-ASCII characters in names.

The *original* intent was to <contact> to work exactly like <author>,
except that you place it as a child element of <section> (and you could
call that section anything you want). See
<https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-rfc7991bis-latest.html#element.contact>.

> I was (naively?) expecting a Contacts section, just like the "Author's
> Addresses' that
> lists some more information, or another way to see that more information
> is available.

There is no auto-generated section (and AFAICT, it's not needed).

> ...

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest