Re: [rfc-i] xref to "References" section
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 23 November 2016 06:38 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD95129554
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:38:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id nTN93RfLkvLr
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:37:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEAC7129540
for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>;
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:37:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F58B81A92;
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:37:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0CDB81A92
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:37:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id jqdKK3t_HJS6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7FB5B81A8D
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.109.81]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001
[212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MBVwM-1c03mp1BOo-00AVeo; Wed, 23
Nov 2016 07:37:45 +0100
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <493309A6-A90E-4525-BDDB-2E81287460C4@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <8a2fe6e2-7363-bf4a-3aa3-198138caa7d9@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 07:37:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <493309A6-A90E-4525-BDDB-2E81287460C4@tzi.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qSO7rWsFwSNyz6eAdHQpdlKTIRmmEHNrVb/bCAjwyA6ew5jpmfE
/t2CLv+etmuKbSTssHGHCpZPLwJIpSp6eTIoqACbLpIqqYUV2kfZF3cPbQuCs964fHeApPf
7UW0BiXfg6UBPxur3xXKyBptCCWvYC9T7jDGVamK2rcLjcECmKAAPXTucwcB/uaKhrpnacb
YA7A1NYwwNyxB/Q4qDVpQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DPXaos73He4=:VKuWtJ2SM9sFVLxw1pWFuk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Subject: Re: [rfc-i] xref to "References" section
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions."
<rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
On 2016-11-23 06:08, Carsten Bormann wrote: > There is an interesting issue on kramdown-rfc: > > https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629/issues/31 > > <references> does not allow an `anchor` attribute in RFC 7749, and XML2RFC enforces this. > In any case, use of this attribute would allow xrefs to “Informative References”/“Normative References”, but not to “References”, a section that is now generated automatically. > > Any idea how to solve this with RFCXML? > > Grüße, Carsten I don't see an obvious way that wouldn't also make the XML invalid (in the sense of DTD/RNG). Best regards, Julian _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] xref to "References" section Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] xref to "References" section Julian Reschke