IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-rseme-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA5C120A51 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nsbYM1hPNXXX for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01EAC120A00 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C904F4073B; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A342F4073B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C6H7KqGzd1DJ for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BF9CF4072C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id 193so1242522pfc.13 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GepHu5VrZ8gwFvQx9GlbazG/okRqHbnC0njGb/22y0Q=; b=QyasaBZ/Hn6KITL+mtpucw0mSRPcqH7eZxwdR9CNwUlMwyCp3a9S5iLnOXXvhC24Ta rX17kegZ3mFHhEVSN9AJ2S9kXk0bnyyip+LqmN7Mewi3xW8401+Uxh/70uy3DTmsQmQW h0HrEvnRQtcG2fSOUbTnryECBXIpxM542N7Ph/YOcrgTzcTuQ2wFQCf4AdsZFlZZcPmW R39DmO+yjMciJGhAvC1bd7H7hY+HZNU/AEaVCLOTgvuj7urDpPRtkbAeGreHrOVzGv88 PMIKxuchuzXV0riQuPqfFvTnhjI6XU0zWySkvIkDmmIPqh2f7ruykqbvhUrnf40BBYi5 YMEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GepHu5VrZ8gwFvQx9GlbazG/okRqHbnC0njGb/22y0Q=; b=eidqgrypVKOTnUXMf9VKjHrXmGpEzTlh9y4qdH9Z3vmyYL6eXKisU8kfPWEcrmU4ws RCr8RmHouv452LDExGAC+YA80pmFzoZQfFZ2t8CLUvL95AV2rJQCQTFdyuDvqabQ7heI A/GBYsckhP6Kq+MuI8wjpsmbVx1WaweVzqy0s+95FtQEkXyKHhAyMeOej7U4mzC3MOb5 lUaSjx6RTZpP0um0WSZcGtIH76iPzm+sg9gFyxgiCR2dctLQc+FOM/x4hfMO/qT0vDNC ffupTO3CbSdAuwTo5zovS1fxXvbcusLwVJV0fiyhuz1la7QSvVC8v92mxjjJd8GOWQuu 2/yg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsB6WHwZLP5xcHMXgbXVR5StFIkJ+dbZReBDSPwa3pW95n1WSc O+EF13YJUcV/CafNRGGcs5fiZWR9
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwBtJ+PjoJbc1ZX4/eIsrDyklwMnUVCWnPknlCVEDrB5+Q1WnVfLT8TvbT4jvuiSEMOO4E2gA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:368c:: with SMTP id d134mr1639053pga.321.1572470930261; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (46.137.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.137.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b59sm1578031pjc.14.2019.10.30.14.28.48 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <157195362260.11387.2707786903653263155.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E9E92899-87E7-4036-8182-3330622DE71C@rfc-editor.org> <DD26A382-4570-4B38-9DBC-07D1F7F4A045@piuha.net> <AF955C24-4056-4775-B9B2-D6773925C973@piuha.net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <889be7fe-c81f-e280-f1fe-a5c1ce0479c1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:28:47 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AF955C24-4056-4775-B9B2-D6773925C973@piuha.net>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-rseme-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 31-Oct-19 07:49, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Due to some off-list comments (thanks!), I realise that I wanted to clarify the comment that I made about past chairs in the text. I specifically would like to suggest a change in the text of the document. But I did not want to state an opinion about who is or is not suitable or capable for the task. 
> 
> The change that I’d suggest is:
> 
> OLD:
> Past IAB or IETF chairs would likely be good choices.
> NEW:
> (deleted)
> 
> Rationale: What people you want leading an effort is always a consideration, a complex one, with many variables. I just don’t want us to put any particular set of people in a special role, either in positive or negative fashion.

Speaking as someone who was on the third call where this point came up, and who would qualify, my immediate reaction was that I didn't really want that sticky label on me anyway ;-). However, there is an underlying point: we do want people with a wider view than just the current incumbents in I* and RFC* roles. Past I* chairs are in that category, so they are fair examples.

   Brian


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email