[rfc-i] tabs [was: sourcecode indentation]

[jhildebr at cisco.com (Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr))]

On 2/19/16, 4:06 AM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:



>FWIW, BS and RS aren't allowed in XML 1.0, so we'd need to define a
>custom way to represent them...

base64 if you need to generate a binary file.  As a matter of fact, do we need the equivalent of "Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64" in the XML?  RFC 6716 might have used that.

If you just want to make the text understood, ?(U+241E: SYMBOL FOR RECORD SEPARATOR) and ?(U+2408: SYMBOL FOR BACKSPACE) are handy.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand