Re: [rfc-i] Informational...

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 11 June 2020 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDCE3A0AE3; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5cdfqufJXr1; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 871B23A0AC7; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED76F40705; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E567CF40705 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RS4pdLhza0ir for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12E5DF406F7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7B86E24216; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
References: <021bfdfc-136c-ea07-e2d5-042d9e429522@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:00:58 -0700
In-Reply-To: <021bfdfc-136c-ea07-e2d5-042d9e429522@nthpermutation.com> (Michael StJohns's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:24:06 -0400")
Message-ID: <yblk10dr0z9.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Informational...
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> writes:

> I was looking at a document that's currently on last call for the
> third time in the transport area with a proposed status of
> "Informational".

Do you think this sort of list would fall nicely into the larger picture
of tagging/organization discussions that seem to be floating around a
lot at the same time?
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest