Re: [rfc-i] document dependence, was Meta decorations in generated HTML

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Sun, 29 May 2022 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236A9C14F727 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 May 2022 16:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653865413; bh=IAjXq8X9AT1gSE0ziMWykPZ9hg87OfDFpWIjijxCrgA=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=vpPub4AQ/n6h86vQ7u7ybzHh7MnVWzVXzNLtWHqDzWAwsBb8E9k62SGXZLGmT3oAh qv5lFQOJTC74vLt39wvDFH5Mh8UNp1oQDu7WKwchZ/MxJljvybrdTdaDQEsKR8PAbE MoA426TdZTcsYThXweXmUeQU3go96snEsEkfhz+s=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sun May 29 16:03:33 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08F0C14F613; Sun, 29 May 2022 16:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653865413; bh=IAjXq8X9AT1gSE0ziMWykPZ9hg87OfDFpWIjijxCrgA=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=vpPub4AQ/n6h86vQ7u7ybzHh7MnVWzVXzNLtWHqDzWAwsBb8E9k62SGXZLGmT3oAh qv5lFQOJTC74vLt39wvDFH5Mh8UNp1oQDu7WKwchZ/MxJljvybrdTdaDQEsKR8PAbE MoA426TdZTcsYThXweXmUeQU3go96snEsEkfhz+s=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EE9C14F692 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 May 2022 16:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=tNx75P9a; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=EHB4ZekR
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZAT4VYu0CVIw for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 May 2022 16:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE0EBC14F612 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 29 May 2022 16:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7437A32008FC for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 29 May 2022 19:03:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 29 May 2022 19:03:24 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1653865403; x=1653951803; bh=Cb5bA42cLN 5s+IS9viDcemqMQznE3D177GszaVUNlfo=; b=tNx75P9aY3dJ4uRDgqiVSjuOo4 IXXMZL56D4bBVjPfkm9kg8OxxLHnyeHCLKYJqIQZ6rrqUmiLDdsLJB0M5sdZDQ1d gg3xjblxfBtQAy+W/scgAxiNSJTAaWdVgw+b0EP5okPeRwvBx+e+30WkrDJZ86eN Yka1SPaR5PqlEFmOgvVpmM0ICTsyU2bESmveCrkuUbvRb/PglH37ryvnBySU4bYB 3Lpyjp52a2nqxllOJ+u/AwSbRCCHIxneVUI28bSvgJZbY2LAgZwONFnVphfn+zEd KLzZgHEQ911Sifhm7VDdnzU+iGE6upWxw6jAdNwMrqlUHJFQCR3V5EyvZBYg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1653865403; x=1653951803; bh=Cb5bA42cLN5s+IS9viDcemqMQznE 3D177GszaVUNlfo=; b=EHB4ZekRR+O5mStIgznqhKbCQRnlqz4hsnRVWuEPM82f Hojz7NNWyJ8WESVERbTJzsv2og4VC/osNSg5rTTHrnEDUNUD4Sf4Pu/S/6A3T0nI is4orv3td8Eq5QgiB+Qbd65vnLcQ+dYIxgwBBCpI8V5y46sl2KFKHP9DifjLW4sA T97DfrtMBZaE0b8FRY9FTbQ6wvktiAY4FfUf+Mnum7IK+L4JXenRvsZ0eG6yZqY5 PGKiDV45N2r5IGCYGe60UyronqcNEwEa3AAdiwtIdiLur/SjBMykdd2enYiKH1fF njnhGKA6YR9F0KAwwZKXnlf2tmctPuZRTcpV0j2stg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:u_uTYnhvl2X-ywSauOo1SppeAhtcZvVGhcpTMm50HHn56cKeNkuMKA> <xme:u_uTYkBiNmpHa2reYpbbmzaPKcY94WRxOordRAUA2Y5DiQzf3P3kr1lxMPi69wOl8 1YrMoFQED9240PYI4o>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrkeehgdduhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohif vghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepteevueevvdeuueffhfelhf fgfeegfeeikefflefgheeiieeghfdttedvudethfelnecuffhomhgrihhnpehrfhgtqdgv ughithhorhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:u_uTYnGtzR9v01g4rmdcX0_sUIvIo9hzmgyXzcH8mngq3MNj6nKIfQ> <xmx:u_uTYkTLdXuk9GCwdxAEEqiGiYGpu314ZloUOZu0AQ84LSFsy43IRg> <xmx:u_uTYkxouvwoHwVk755SpB4KLCresKdSWF4FuXSUt8qxfPcoxCrejA> <xmx:u_uTYj9RaVdqw3VdJs0yEKgHl9-zWiPzz5bmJzeSpKTLUqblBekhjg>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id B41E12340076; Sun, 29 May 2022 19:03:23 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-591-gfe6c3a2700-fm-20220427.001-gfe6c3a27
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <84caefc7-30a5-4835-b8c4-ab5e31035fea@beta.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220528221515.EA52141DB4A0@ary.qy>
References: <20220528221515.EA52141DB4A0@ary.qy>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 09:03:04 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/gZtadGoaPX_G6fDKqBx0zsPIFuE>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] document dependence, was Meta decorations in generated HTML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Sun, May 29, 2022, at 08:15, John Levine wrote:
> But in fact the rendered HTML includes
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/js/metadata.min.js, and imports three fonts
> from Google. I think the HTML will display legibly if none of those
> are available but I haven't checked.

I have.  It works fine.

(The fonts should be hosted alongside the HTML though.  It used to be that relying on Google's CDN was better, but that is now slower and less private.)

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest