[rfc-i] IEEE Spectrum post on RFCs
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 07 April 2019 05:24 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2611200FC for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 22:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5P3B9JniHlQW for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 22:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABCA81200F1 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 22:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC698B80E94; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 22:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC4EB80E94 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 22:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yYItSe8rkTDj for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 22:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF4CB80E93 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 22:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id ck15so5370833plb.3 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 22:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oK+1qk0vzs6WDW3JfzGW93YFEo5ci1r9AhlQb+GI0So=; b=q7FA9b1MahNj/uGhX0SLr8X5kkZ5Sx3JHI0mcMIbzZ2SBM/GtDLZrrJwr/0PD4Sm9Z W86kyGW6GZfXwoNgHvd63FQN0TZGxhSu15lpkCRx21WMskdF10iYZCXmtheE+lgJ/cKL 7R2J51ZKNaLtcrnHLVXgOKnbwPCYgYhPqc3AOSpv3mOTnQ80dMn96mMVTtNnlzJsj/Kh 33Xfquxm8pJuf1iYBJBR5aoX3M4bpL+V/okGH94b2U/XPjroTUZGJFy3AAWeeiV59VCm 9pej8pn2DMWklGFzbYeYx84w9jjndpt3/1XE1fcCZJrY0gUtUUamXK8Aj6fVURBoD1yW FDHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oK+1qk0vzs6WDW3JfzGW93YFEo5ci1r9AhlQb+GI0So=; b=muUgEPzfS7KjUeMst2yYgwcJx6eAdVZvGKuepqRpYW0KfYVOeUSvbS0TuoHkjM42Yi bEoB4MUy8sX6ASZEKFrqvEPXvWnLnEzU0Spkbw4kOFleCVh7FAj4VGZhKqz0tJnwcvxv cXnN/40gm7MmdKOagCPGmkLr2EFC+CX8fPcDq7Muey+UUWEW3y9GtVQ1bDCcqrmF0dqV k9RDggI7BCD9mP7XUfbzTroLRa3ak3hnDEJrKxVZrVSb8OebAc1YTmNqkupbpKOIo2rg zmlw5RJBBhYdg/E+k9xdd//J+6shFOdv3ym6lKQKlm87S5QIzr2uRXi9wsuGMBhtOKaK geKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUM2KTnXuCO/riPayXzvO3btH3EmN98YljsKlY6YmZj+STO2duP XBtKVGUSvY+qAqcdyX2qxp3IikGE
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjFYjXyCA5QUka2v2kSfB3H4qDQOuD/Gh7mgz8sMdmIRziynU5Wi+9Pq90vf1vCn/LOP+osA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:28a9:: with SMTP id f38mr2935566plb.295.1554614642577; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 22:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([118.148.72.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b14sm38248896pfi.92.2019.04.06.22.24.00 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Apr 2019 22:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <42e7ec34-50de-1858-b097-f3d5fe9ad4bc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 17:24:00 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: [rfc-i] IEEE Spectrum post on RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/networks/pigeonbased-feathernet-still-wingsdown-fastest-way-of-transferring-lots-of-data Regards Brian _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] IEEE Spectrum post on RFCs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] IEEE Spectrum post on RFCs Andrew G. Malis