IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rfc-i] Implementations of v3?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 24 October 2016 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7355F129435 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.032
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.032 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GRNxlGUGjV1D for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D73411293DA for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FC1B8015E; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EBCB8015E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kiWiUIOnkQpO for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D15FAB8015D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 5947C31D5F; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:59:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BBD26EC0B6D; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:59:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:59:42 +0000
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Message-ID: <20161024175942.GA30369@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Subject: [rfc-i] Implementations of v3?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Now that the RFCs on the new canonical format are in AUTH48, what is
the state of their implementation? I noticed the SOWs
<https://iaoc.ietf.org/rfps.html> but I did'nt find about the
results. Are the tools done, almost done, work in progress?
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email