IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 02 December 2016 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D09E1295EE for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:40:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EiYL301esnjt for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:40:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91A841295DF for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:40:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6964CB80145; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:40:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C777B80145; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:40:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6uzto_mTo98u; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:40:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x243.google.com (mail-pg0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::243]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50BEEB80144; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:40:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x243.google.com with SMTP id e9so8699653pgc.1; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 11:40:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rOmLKdYGSVv1iknLMmApAzy4k8EWy5qGansqcaN/2i8=; b=zU6IGHCY0NLM26efopcbfqE3vo+HH9tbrxvkqQhZRZDttgfOaDhju4aqvYy013mUc8 43x3qrS1Y4x/PyV+eEUOWUxwVoTERl20Gi6vmzah6RzvzjDvxJs4q7Rsiyb5bpUHa5nS t8IEm/OhFAk8cE2hEvjVJMfzL5EHJnW/U2HXwlTEeYDlmPf5VnEd3ysjuaR3MAjdldgg 2N7Pf3WX3Ev59VRZotaHQMrKEDtb4F976fTxNCxvTQxT7iB49gd56n/clmE+rOiQthm3 MTeHr6jrucawXSAotZNY5F9mNBExMWDSQ9By+AS3Pj0Tku5iREZHF4JlcRIAZsePxo+b qQDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rOmLKdYGSVv1iknLMmApAzy4k8EWy5qGansqcaN/2i8=; b=eDJz2JD7HhYUUJXoYmsrQJIAaftQBTv0BT1p2Lk/V7qB0X9zlGG3iRdmNmQBJtnYGQ q0L19rgLYJWK3+z7GpBS1Dhq4vLISi+HNWsyao4dLk2yKsPP8dD2tK2TEd0gxiEJeAeB y8UMmKXQdJ7gwZbIqarPsAKgehx3sUrZ7LTny6tBu/ZnLi3oHynLL6uRQnahBe2p3QvF IJTrFNg1JqU6SWBg+vXtEX2U16TtD/BNTLkcsQHBfwzOHq+KbgjOQOLg7MgalH4u8GfU N7o6nPG0IeEUSV7aBSzr43UT9I+/tR3qaOHXCDlQkuCF6EOnrE9HJTIwDPzCWIsfXOt9 DwrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00wWIEaoBxZyPnph9Yg9CqKvOu33Q1UTNpcuPPj3E1hmlOq/Njd9gMxnIk7km8grg==
X-Received: by 10.99.104.68 with SMTP id d65mr80801528pgc.52.1480707633887; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 11:40:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([118.148.125.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y200sm9659490pfb.16.2016.12.02.11.40.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Dec 2016 11:40:33 -0800 (PST)
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org> <04f701d24c79$3df584e0$b9e08ea0$@olddog.co.uk> <DB2453E2-8F62-4D5F-B9A2-A1B306F962CF@gmail.com> <CABkgnnWBKp9u15UKnNUEfuq7dQWbnEX4oqmzBNs-MiDxY+o3uA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <4c37364c-0813-2916-cf49-eb1d3bef03fe@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 08:40:41 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWBKp9u15UKnNUEfuq7dQWbnEX4oqmzBNs-MiDxY+o3uA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 02/12/2016 22:32, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 2 December 2016 at 20:28, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I prefer crafting the Acknowledgement section by hand, because often it is not just a list of names. “Thanks to Jane for contributing the test vectors. Special thanks to Julian for contributing the ABNF”.

Who says you can't do that? The formal Contributors section is usefulfor people who
don't quite make it into the Authors section, because of the policy of limiting
the number of auhors. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.11

> Yeah, frankly I think that this is a bit of a mess:
> https://tlswg.github.io/tls13-spec/#contributors  Yes, all those
> people deserve acknowledgment (except me), but it's almost the longest
> section in the document now.

That is *not* the intended use of the Contributors section IMHO.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.10

    Brian


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email