IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Fixing names in references to old RFCs

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Sun, 21 February 2021 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57193A1225; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:06:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=BZ/1G0MF; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=RqrDkAr9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UhhL2NJUv0ga; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 410EE3A1224; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0617CF4070F; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:06:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAC3F4070F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:06:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=BZ/1G0MF; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=RqrDkAr9
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x5EZMI6TMY56 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:06:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C012FF4070E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:06:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62AF5C0047; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:06:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:06:13 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=Mc+beHyZ3l7gVVRTBi2kkuD+lOaYS1i 4gMy3V+lxcp8=; b=BZ/1G0MFu9fdOkhdTur3WJnFsAY4pD00M6usa+3WG2NW/9W K8aenTilwQRFC9+zY4JTxaFGXWfn/9thP8atUjbzVmRbL54wkOxgz0wkmeIPL31W nGdWXidcrqEZlmZO7pDg62Fv5/vC5gS3keRFvOU896P2JsMxFApmuhEaSt0uRKTb O4qAU3RJ2kuecv/yOlK+m44YnIf26EnrCb/0smccLEzXKfp4EShWNns5AwW7PaVz Ziefg8wmrftFFCg4KImX7d6gK9Y8SRszOyyfHNsgbpBln5zapR1qjPq8PaXlu1Fc oOoJjBpNKPXM1Wx5XIfPZEtfyBEGwDcnAxLnbXw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Mc+beH yZ3l7gVVRTBi2kkuD+lOaYS1i4gMy3V+lxcp8=; b=RqrDkAr9mgCIUw8+kEnvms N0hNR/rkwuNZ71MRsW6i6Gpawc2kl5/22gvFNs2yas0bVVvT9VXJjOun4XazQMDS tyr/Wo0Ch6kwwPoWUGGDuXzCJQLkL35wmBwJoTa/pAdQLPRa9gYzNwtxx2gZVTm8 Gc/7nwvVUJL6TStG97ym+dn2hrTy/1u4cLY5LnMyJykuW0/iz9EZxCnVFvqUWWK2 YGCRe3R7XR/nzgyOo+wgoydxxrOFuxRrbt73J2rAZdUJHmhcmCPBUAw/wui48rVB UaIMhZ1URaZmGuao67F/yY8AIYYbz//Yxl+M7+PrfuPDM+6Ns+1r2KNgQif8FbFg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:VdkyYIWjeETAvkR4URsg09NFoL_vFBwGejtCMEUjP1PG0KW9gfzMvw> <xme:VdkyYMk52eYdEyBiFMV8LxQPReMgRsQjX8w_G_TA0F3djIdrkjOTdT41cjvdMxQ6r 69KDwHdTziu3BQV2Rs>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkedugdduheehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfelgfevteffheejvdfgudeijefgudeigeegteeggfeuledugfff veegfeehhfefnecuffhomhgrihhnpegrphgrshhthihlvgdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhho phihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:VdkyYMaIFP-f1krHWOFCJPV9-BtqvwcMVRLT0ypPKa8Lx5rhFY5-uQ> <xmx:VdkyYHWMCx5lN8i_MxJ7V0dvpjZWMWuJK4Enz4BPaaSGei_BXLja6A> <xmx:VdkyYCmwO1mMQHaAYaPz1bgJeJpHJYsilAnVgwNY2Gjt_TYOntvZvg> <xmx:VdkyYMR8tU1fnbvzr_RIwgphlhTsN7cW8hN2mrtKbUcyb5JG7qFlcw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 01F184E0081; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:06:13 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-141-gf094924a34-fm-20210210.001-gf094924a
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <63b758bb-1f6d-4ccb-b45b-317294a8933a@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210221024518.70F376E622BE@ary.qy>
References: <20210221024518.70F376E622BE@ary.qy>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:05:53 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Fixing names in references to old RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021, at 13:45, John Levine wrote:
> The universal custom in bibliographies is to cite a name the way it's
> written in the original publication, [...]
> https://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2017/05/whats-in-a-name-inconsistent-formats-and-name-changes.html

Thanks John, that is a good explanation.
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email